Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25964793›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Cisgenic apple trees; development, characterization, and performance.

Frans A Krens, Jan G Schaart, Aranka M van der Burgh, Iris E M Tinnenbroek-Capel, Remmelt Groenwold, Linda P Kodde, Giovanni A L Broggini, Cesare Gessler, Henk J Schouten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Applications of Genomic Tools in Plant Breeding: Crop Biofortification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frans A KrensWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Jan G SchaartWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Aranka M van der BurghWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Iris E M Tinnenbroek-CapelWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Remmelt GroenwoldWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Linda P KoddeWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Giovanni A L BrogginiPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Cesare GesslerPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Henk J SchoutenWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two methods were developed for the generation of cisgenic apples. Both have been successfully applied producing trees. The first method avoids the use of any foreign selectable marker genes; only the gene-of-interest is integrated between the T-DNA border sequences. The second method makes use of recombinase-based marker excision. For the first method we used the MdMYB10 gene from a red-fleshed apple coding for a transcription factor involved in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis. Red plantlets were obtained and presence of the cisgene was confirmed. Plantlets were grafted and grown in a greenhouse. After 3 years, the first flowers appeared, showing red petals. Pollination led to production of red-fleshed cisgenic apples. The second method used the pM(arker)F(ree) vector system, introducing the scab resistance gene Rvi6, derived from apple. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, followed by selection on kanamycin, produced genetically modified apple lines. Next, leaves from in vitro material were treated to activate the recombinase leading to excision of selection genes. Subsequently, the leaf explants were subjected to negative selection for marker-free plantlets by inducing regeneration on medium containing 5-fluorocytosine. After verification of the marker-free nature, the obtained plants were grafted onto rootstocks. Young trees from four cisgenic lines and one intragenic line, all containing Rvi6, were planted in an orchard. Appropriate controls were incorporated in this trial. We scored scab incidence for three consecutive years on leaves after inoculations with Rvi6-avirulent strains. One cisgenic line and the intragenic line performed as well as the resistant control. In 2014 trees started to overcome their juvenile character and formed flowers and fruits. The first results of scoring scab symptoms on apple fruits were obtained. Apple fruits from susceptible controls showed scab symptoms, while fruits from cisgenic and intragenic lines were free of scab.

Indexed as

anthocyaninsapplecisgenesisfield trialMalus × domesticaMdMYB10Rvi6scab resistance

Identifiers

PMID25964793
PMCPMC4410516
OpenAlexW2117388855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.