Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25964747›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2015

Neurons in red nucleus and primary motor cortex exhibit similar responses to mechanical perturbations applied to the upper-limb during posture.

Troy M Herter, Tomohiko Takei, Douglas P Munoz, Stephen H Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neural Signals in Red Nucleus during Reactive and Proactive Adjustments in Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Long-latency Responses to a Mechanical Perturbation of the Index Finger Have a Spinal Component.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Troy M HerterCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada ; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA.
Tomohiko TakeiCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada ; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada.
Stephen H ScottCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada ; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada ; Department of Medicine, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary motor cortex (M1) and red nucleus (RN) are brain regions involved in limb motor control. Both structures are highly interconnected with the cerebellum and project directly to the spinal cord, although the contribution of RN is smaller than M1. It remains uncertain whether RN and M1 serve similar or distinct roles during posture and movement. Many neurons in M1 respond rapidly to mechanical disturbances of the limb, but it remains unclear whether RN neurons also respond to such limb perturbations. We have compared discharges of single neurons in RN (n = 49) and M1 (n = 109) of one monkey during a postural perturbation task. Neural responses to whole-limb perturbations were examined by transiently applying (300 ms) flexor or extensor torques to the shoulder and/or elbow while the monkeys attempted to maintain a static hand posture. Relative to baseline discharges before perturbation onset, perturbations evoked rapid (<100 ms) changes of neural discharges in many RN (28 of 49, 57%) and M1 (43 of 109, 39%) neurons. In addition to exhibiting a greater proportion of perturbation-related neurons, RN neurons also tended to exhibit higher peak discharge frequencies in response to perturbations than M1 neurons. Importantly, neurons in both structures exhibited similar response latencies and tuning properties (preferred torque directions and tuning widths) in joint-torque space. Proximal arm muscles also displayed similar tuning properties in joint-torque space. These results suggest that RN is more sensitive than M1 to mechanical perturbations applied during postural control but both structures may play a similar role in feedback control of posture.

Indexed as

optimal feedback controlperturbationprimary motor cortexred nucleusupper-limb muscle

Identifiers

PMID25964747
PMCPMC4408851
OpenAlexW1987816485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.