Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25964640›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2015

Diagnostic delays are common among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nishant Patel, Adam C Yopp, Amit G Singal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. DecipheringEpigenomics · 2024
    Article
  20. Liquid Liver Biopsy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishant PatelFrom the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Adam C YoppFrom the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. From the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Amit G SingalFrom the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. From the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. From the Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System; and Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, and the Departments of Surgery and Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
UT-Southwestern Clinical and Translational Alliance for Research (UT-STAR) (TL1)UL1TR000451 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$6.3M
UT Southwestern Center of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR)R24HS022418 · AHRQ · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALM, ETHAN A · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022418AHRQ HHS R24HS022418NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000451NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000451NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) present at advanced stages. The prevalence and clinical impact of delays during diagnostic evaluation among patients with HCC is unclear. PURPOSE: To identify and characterize factors associated with diagnostic delays among patients with HCC.

methodsRecords were reviewed for consecutive patients with cirrhosis and HCC at a large urban hospital between January 2005 and July 2012. Time from presentation to diagnosis was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Diagnostic delay was defined as time to diagnosis exceeding 3 months, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify correlates of diagnostic delays.

resultsAmong 457 patients with HCC, 226 (49.5%) were diagnosed as outpatients. Among these, median time-to-diagnosis was 2.2 months, with 87 patients (38.5%) experiencing a diagnostic delay. Diagnostic delays were positively associated with the presence of hepatic encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% CI, 1.03-5.07) and negatively associated with presentation after implementation of the electronic medical records (EMR) (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.15-0.52) and presentation with an abnormal ultrasound (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.67) on multivariate analysis. Higher rates of diagnostic delays were observed among those with hepatic encephalopathy (56% vs 35%), whereas lower rates were seen in those who presented after EMR implementation (26% vs 60%) and those who presented with an abnormal ultrasound with or without an elevated alpha fetoprotein level (27% vs 50%). Among 49 patients with mass-forming HCC and diagnostic delay, 18% had interval tumor growth of 2 cm or greater.

conclusionsNearly 20% of patients with HCC wait more than 3 months from presentation to diagnosis, which can contribute to interval tumor growth.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25964640
PMCPMC5624109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.