Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25964403›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Health IT-Enabled Care Coordination: A National Survey of Patient-Centered Medical Home Clinicians.

Suzanne Morton, Sarah C Shih, Chloe H Winther, Aldo Tinoco, Rodger S Kessler, Sarah Hudson Scholle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Technology-facilitated care coordination in rural areas: What is needed?International journal of medical informatics · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. In This Issue: A Cry for Balance.Annals of family medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suzanne MortonNational Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC morton@ncqa.org.
Sarah C ShihPrimary Care Information Project, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York.
Chloe H WintherUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Aldo TinocoEvolent Health, Arlington, Virginia.
Rodger S KesslerUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont.
Sarah Hudson ScholleNational Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC.

Funding

Care Coordination Enabled by Health IT: What Will It Take?R18HS022693 · AHRQ · NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE · PI SCHOLLE, SARAH H. · 2013 to 2013
$500k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS022693AHRQ HHS R18HS022693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHealth information technology (IT) offers promising tools for improving care coordination. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of 6 proposed care coordination objectives for stage 3 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services electronic health record incentive program (Meaningful Use) related to referrals, notification of care from other facilities, patient clinical summaries, and patient dashboards.

methodsWe surveyed physician-owned and hospital/health system-affiliated primary care practices that achieved patient-centered medical home recognition and participated in the Meaningful Use program, and community health clinics with patient-centered medical home recognition (most with certified electronic health record systems). The response rate was 35.1%. We ascertained whether practices had implemented proposed objectives and perceptions of their importance. We analyzed the association of organizational and contextual factors with self-reported use of health IT to support care coordination activities.

resultsAlthough 78% of the 350 respondents viewed timely notification of hospital discharges as very important, only 48.7% used health IT systems to accomplish this task. The activity most frequently supported by health IT was providing clinical summaries to patients, in 76.6% of practices; however, merely 47.7% considered this activity very important. Greater use of health IT to support care coordination activities was positively associated with the presence of a nonclinician responsible for care coordination and the practice's capacity for systematic change.

conclusionsEven among practices having a strong commitment to the medical home model, the use of health IT to support care coordination objectives is not consistent. Health IT capabilities are not currently aligned with clinicians' priorities. Many practices will need financial and technical assistance for health IT to enhance care coordination.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth PersonnelHumansMeaningful UseMedical InformaticsPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSelf ReportUnited Statescare coordinationelectronic health recordsmeaningful usepatient-centered medical homepractice-based researchprimary caretechnology

Identifiers

PMID25964403
PMCPMC4427420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.