Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963988›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Altered Micafungin Pharmacokinetics in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Vincent J Lempers, Jeroen A Schouten, Nicole G Hunfeld, Angela Colbers, Henk J van Leeuwen, David M Burger, Paul E Verweij, Peter Pickkers, Roger J Brüggemann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01783379 (Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01783379 completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (Mycamine ®) Given Intravenously as Therapy to Patients With an Invasive Fungal Infection in the Intensive Care Unit - a Search for Co-variates

TypeobservationalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2013 to 2014Enrolled20ConditionsInvasive Fungal InfectionArmsmicafungin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A protocol for an international, multicentre pharmacokinetic study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units: The SAFE-ICU study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Echinocandins - structure, mechanism of action and use in antifungal therapy.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent J LempersRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen A SchoutenCanisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicole G HunfeldErasmus Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela ColbersRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henk J van LeeuwenRijnstate Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
David M BurgerRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Paul E VerweijRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter PickkersRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roger J BrüggemannRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands roger.bruggemann@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micafungin is considered an important agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit (ICU). Little is known on the pharmacokinetics of micafungin. We investigated micafungin pharmacokinetics (PK) in ICU patients and set out to explore the parameters that influence micafungin plasma concentrations. ICU patients receiving 100 mg of intravenous micafungin once daily for suspected or proven fungal infection or as prophylaxis were eligible. Daily trough concentrations and PK curves (days 3 and 7) were collected. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a standard two-stage approach. Twenty patients from the ICUs of four hospitals were evaluated. On day 3 (n = 20), the median (interquartile range [IQR]) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) was 78.6 (65.3 to 94.1) mg · h/liter, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) was 7.2 (5.4 to 9.2) mg/liter, the concentration 24 h after dosing (C24) was 1.55 (1.4 to 3.1) mg/liter, the volume of distribution (V) was 25.6 (21.3 to 29.1) liters, the clearance (CL) was 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) liters/h, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was 13.7 (12.2 to 15.5) h. The pharmacokinetic parameters on day 7 (n = 12) were not significantly different from those on day 3. Daily trough concentrations (day 3 to the end of therapy) showed moderate interindividual (57.9%) and limited intraindividual variability (12.9%). No covariates of the influence on micafungin exposure were identified. Micafungin was considered safe and well tolerated. We performed the first PK study with very intensive sampling on multiple occasions in ICU patients, which aided in resolving micafungin PK. Strikingly, micafungin exposure in our cohort of ICU patients was lower than that in healthy volunteers but not significantly different from that of other reference populations. The clinical consequence of these findings must be investigated in a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) study incorporating outcome in a larger cohort. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01783379.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveCritical CareDrug Administration ScheduleEchinocandinsFemaleHalf-LifeHumansIntensive Care UnitsLipopeptidesMaleMicafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID25963988
PMCPMC4505244
OpenAlexW1904075288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.