Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963983›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Evaluating the pharmacodynamic effect of antimalarial drugs in clinical trials by quantitative PCR.

Louise Marquart, Mark Baker, Peter O'Rourke, James S McCarthy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02223871 (A Proof-of-concept Study to Assess the Effect of ACT-451840 Against Early Plasmodium Falciparum Blood Stage Infection in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02223871 phase1completednot on this map

A Proof-of-concept Study to Assess the Effect of ACT-451840 Against Early Plasmodium Falciparum Blood Stage Infection in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Ran2014 to 2014Enrolled8ConditionsHealthy SubjectsArmsACT-451840:, Plasmodium falciparum-infected human erythrocytes:, Artemether 20 mg and lumefantrine 120mg combination tablet:, Primaquine:
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Advancing liposome technology for innovative strategies against malaria.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Characterizing the Blood-Stage Antimalarial Activity of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Experimentally Infected With Plasmodium falciparum.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Liver Function Test Abnormalities in Experimental and ClinicalThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise MarquartQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Mark BakerMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter O'RourkeQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.
James S McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia j.mccarthy@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing development of new antimalarial drugs and the increasing use of controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies to investigate their activity in early-stage clinical trials require the development of methods to analyze their pharmacodynamic effect. This is especially so for studies where quantitative PCR (qPCR) is becoming the preferred method for assessing parasite clearance as the study endpoint. We report the development and validation of an analytic approach for qPCR-determined parasite clearance data. First, in a clinical trial with the licensed antimalarial combination sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (S/P), qPCR data were collected from 12 subjects and used to determine qPCR replicate variability and to identify outliers. Then, an iterative analytic approach based on modeling the log-linear decay of parasitemia following drug treatment was developed to determine the parasite reduction ratio (PRR) and parasite clearance half-life, both measures of parasite clearance. This analytic approach was then validated with data from 8 subjects enrolled in a second study with the licensed antimalarial drug mefloquine. By this method, the PRR and parasite clearance half-lives for S/P and Mefloquine were determined to be 38,878 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 17,396 to 86,889) at 3.15 (95% CI, 2.93 to 3.41) days and 157 (95% CI, 130 to 189) at 6.58 (95% CI, 6.35 to 6.83) days for the respective studies. No serious adverse events occurred in the two trials, and pharmacokinetic values were within expected ranges for sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. The robust statistical method that we have developed to analyze qPCR-derived pharmacodynamic data from CHMI studies will facilitate the assessment of the activity of a range of experimental antimalarial drugs now entering clinical trials. (This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry under registration numbers ACTRN12611001203943 and ACTRN12612000323820.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAntimalarialsArea Under CurveDrug CombinationsFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMalariaMaleMefloquineModels, StatisticalParasitemiaPolymerase Chain ReactionPyrimethamineAntimalarialsDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationMefloquinePyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID25963983
PMCPMC4468738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.