ArticleDer Internist2015
[Hyponatremia and tolvaptan : what is the situation 5 years after approval?].
Article in Der Internist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Follow-up observation on short-term efficacy of low dose tolvaptan in the management of cirrhotic hyponatremia].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diuretic tolvaptan has been approved for more than 5 years for the indications of euvolemic hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion. In recent years many patients have been treated with tolvaptan and many physicians could gather practical experience. Other countries, such as the USA had already gained greater experience, also in the indications for hypervolemic hyponatremia. After approval was granted more than 5000 patients worldwide were included in the so-called hyponatremia register and 22 active centers in Germany with 317 patients participated. Although some details from this now concluded register have been published, the final publication of the multinational post-authorization safety study on tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH has not yet been published. In the years 2012 and 2013 two warning letters were issued on tolvaptan. The first letter warned of the risk of a faster increase in serum sodium using tolvaptan and provided detailed information on how the risk of osmotic demeyelination can be minimized. So far only one proven case of osmotic demelination syndrome (ODS) is known; however, this occurred following incorrect use of tolvaptan in a monotherapy. The second warning letter provided information on the potential risk (reversible) of liver damage by tolvaptan, which resulted from the TEMPO 3:4 study. In this study tolvaptan was used in a higher dosage for therapy of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Although the European renal best practice (ERBP) guidelines from 2014 did not recommend tolvaptan for the indications of SIADH, other guidelines came to different conclusions. In summary, 5 years after the approval of tolvaptan there is still no consensus. At the current time many questions still remain unanswered. Initiation of therapy with tolvaptan remains reserved for experienced physicians in hospitals. Treatment must be adapted on the basis of a clinical estimation of the individual situation of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25963933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.