Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963907›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2015

The cost-effectiveness of 10 antenatal syphilis screening and treatment approaches in Peru, Tanzania, and Zambia.

Fern Terris-Prestholt, Peter Vickerman, Sergio Torres-Rueda, Nancy Santesso, Sedona Sweeney, Patricia Mallma, Katharine D Shelley, Patricia J Garcia, Rachel Bronzan, Michelle M Gill and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Metaanalysis of the Performance of a Combined Treponemal and Nontreponemal Rapid Diagnostic Test for Syphilis and Yaws.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Syphilis and pregnancy.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Fern Terris-PrestholtLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: fern.terris-prestholt@lshtm.ac.uk.
Peter VickermanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sergio Torres-RuedaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nancy SantessoMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sedona SweeneyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Patricia MallmaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Katharine D ShelleyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patricia J GarciaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rachel BronzanHealth and Development International, Newburyport, MA, USA.
Michelle M GillElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.
Nathalie BroutetWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Teodora WiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Charlotte WattsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David MabeyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rosanna W PeelingLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lori NewmanWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBJohns Hopkins University · USWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PKElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USHealth & Development International · USMcMaster University · CAUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRapid plasma reagin (RPR) is frequently used to test women for maternal syphilis. Rapid syphilis immunochromatographic strip tests detecting only Treponema pallidum antibodies (single RSTs) or both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies (dual RSTs) are now available. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of algorithms using these tests to screen pregnant women.

methodsObserved costs of maternal syphilis screening and treatment using clinic-based RPR and single RSTs in 20 clinics across Peru, Tanzania, and Zambia were used to model the cost-effectiveness of algorithms using combinations of RPR, single, and dual RSTs, and no and mass treatment. Sensitivity analyses determined drivers of key results.

resultsAlthough this analysis found screening using RPR to be relatively cheap, most (>70%) true cases went untreated. Algorithms using single RSTs were the most cost-effective in all observed settings, followed by dual RSTs, which became the most cost-effective if dual RST costs were halved. Single test algorithms dominated most sequential testing algorithms, although sequential algorithms reduced overtreatment. Mass treatment was relatively cheap and effective in the absence of screening supplies, though treated many uninfected women.

conclusionThis analysis highlights the advantages of introducing RSTs in three diverse settings. The results should be applicable to other similar settings.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPeruPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTanzaniaZambiaAfricaCost-effectiveness analysisDiagnostic algorithmsLatin AmericaSyphilis screening and treatment

Identifiers

PMID25963907
PMCPMC4510253
OpenAlexW1965812760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.