Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963592›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2015

The use of lineage tracing to study kidney injury and regeneration.

Paola Romagnani, Yuval Rinkevich, Benjamin Dekel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Short-term effects of mechanical loading on the transdifferentiation of condylar chondrocytes.American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. WT1Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Urothelial progenitors in development and repair.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  9. Potential renal stem/progenitor cells identified by in vivo lineage tracing.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paola RomagnaniExcellence Centre for Research, Transfer and High Education for the development of DE NOVO Therapies (DENOTHE), University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Yuval RinkevichStanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Benjamin DekelPaediatric Stem Cell Research Institute &Division of Paediatric Nephrology, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 52621, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lineage tracing is a powerful tool to track cells in vivo and provides enhanced spatial, temporal, and kinetic resolution of the mechanisms that underlie tissue renewal and repair. The data obtained from novel mouse models engineered for lineage tracing has started to transform our understanding of the changes in cell fate that underlie renal pathophysiology, the role of stem and/or progenitor cells in kidney development, and the mechanisms of kidney regeneration. The complexity of the genetic systems that are engineered for lineage tracing requires careful analysis and interpretation. In this Review we emphasize that close attention in lineage tracing studies must be paid to the specificity of the promoter, the use of drug-controlled activation of Cre recombinase as a genetic switch, and the type of reporter that should be engineered into lineage tracing genetic constructs. We evaluate the optimal experimental conditions required to achieve the pre-specified aims of the study and discuss the novel genetic techniques that are becoming available to study putative renal progenitor cells and the mechanisms of kidney regeneration.

Indexed as

RegenerationAcute Kidney InjuryAnimalsCell LineageCytological TechniquesHumansKidneyMiceStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25963592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.