Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963331›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2015

Common genetic variation and schizophrenia polygenic risk influence neurocognitive performance in young adulthood.

Alex Hatzimanolis, Pallav Bhatnagar, Anna Moes, Ruihua Wang, Panos Roussos, Panos Bitsios, Costas N Stefanis, Ann E Pulver, Dan E Arking, Nikolaos Smyrnis and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex HatzimanolisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pallav BhatnagarMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anna MoesMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ruihua WangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Panos RoussosDepartment of Psychiatry, Friedman Brain Institute and Department of Genetics and Genomics Science, Institute of Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Panos BitsiosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Costas N StefanisUniversity Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece.
Ann E PulverDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Dan E ArkingMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nikolaos SmyrnisUniversity Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece.
Nicholas C StefanisUniversity Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios AvramopoulosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USEginition Hospital · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Mental Health Research Institute · GRUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

Identification of genetic determinants of schizophrenia related phenotypesR01MH085018 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AVRAMOPOULOS, DIMITRIOS · 2010 to 2013
$2.5M
1/2 Schizophrenia Heterogeneity and Toxoplasma ExposureR01MH092515 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AVRAMOPOULOS, DIMITRIOS · 2011 to 2013
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085018NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-085018NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-092515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocognitive abilities constitute complex traits with considerable heritability. Impaired neurocognition is typically observed in schizophrenia (SZ), whereas convergent evidence has shown shared genetic determinants between neurocognition and SZ. Here, we report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on neuropsychological and oculomotor traits, linked to SZ, in a general population sample of healthy young males (n = 1079). Follow-up genotyping was performed in an identically phenotyped internal sample (n = 738) and an independent cohort of young males with comparable neuropsychological measures (n = 825). Heritability estimates were determined based on genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and potential regulatory effects on gene expression were assessed in human brain. Correlations with general cognitive ability and SZ risk polygenic scores were tested utilizing meta-analysis GWAS results by the Cognitive Genomics Consortium (COGENT) and the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC-SZ). The GWAS results implicated biologically relevant genetic loci encoding protein targets involved in synaptic neurotransmission, although no robust individual replication was detected and thus additional validation is required. Secondary permutation-based analysis revealed an excess of strongly associated loci among GWAS top-ranked signals for verbal working memory (WM) and antisaccade intra-subject reaction time variability (empirical P < 0.001), suggesting multiple true-positive single-SNP associations. Substantial heritability was observed for WM performance. Further, sustained attention/vigilance and WM were suggestively correlated with both COGENT and PGC-SZ derived polygenic scores. Overall, these results imply that common genetic variation explains some of the variability in neurocognitive functioning among young adults, particularly WM, and provide supportive evidence that increased SZ genetic risk predicts neurocognitive fluctuations in the general population.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdolescentCognition DisordersFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRiskSchizophreniaYoung AdultcognitionendophenotypeGWASpsychosisworking memory

Identifiers

PMID25963331
PMCPMC5008149
OpenAlexW1600258269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.