Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963318›Full record

ArticleMicrovascular research2015

Microsphere skimming in the porcine coronary arteries: Implications for flow quantification.

Matthew Sinclair, Jack Lee, Andreas Schuster, Amedeo Chiribiri, Jeroen van den Wijngaard, Pepijn van Horssen, Maria Siebes, Jos A E Spaan, Eike Nagel, Nicolas P Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microvascular research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Article
  4. Movement of a finite body in channel flow.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew SinclairDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Jack LeeDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Andreas SchusterDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK, Partner Site Göttingen), Göttingen, Germany.
Amedeo ChiribiriDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Jeroen van den WijngaardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pepijn van HorssenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria SiebesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos A E SpaanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eike NagelDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Nicolas P SmithDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence, UK; National Institute of Heath Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, UK; Wellcome Trust and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Medical Engineering Centre, Lambeth Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Department of Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: nicolas.smith@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/029/28253Wellcome Trust 088641Wellcome Trust WT 088641/Z/09/Z)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle skimming is a phenomenon where particles suspended in fluid flowing through vessels distribute disproportionately to bulk fluid volume at junctions. Microspheres are considered a gold standard of intra-organ perfusion measurements and are used widely in studies of flow distribution and quantification. It has previously been hypothesised that skimming at arterial junctions is responsible for a systematic over-estimation of myocardial perfusion from microspheres at the subendocardium. Our objective is to integrate coronary arterial structure and microsphere distribution, imaged at high resolution, to test the hypothesis of microsphere skimming in a porcine left coronary arterial (LCA) network. A detailed network was reconstructed from cryomicrotome imaging data and a Poiseuille flow model was used to simulate flow. A statistical approach using Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals was applied to determine the prevalence of skimming at bifurcations in the LCA. Results reveal that microsphere skimming is most prevalent at bifurcations in the larger coronary arteries, namely the epicardial and transmural arteries. Bifurcations at which skimming was identified have significantly more asymmetric branching parameters. This finding suggests that when using thin transmural segments to quantify flow from microspheres, a skimming-related deposition bias may result in underestimation of perfusion in the subepicardium, and overestimation in the subendocardium.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationHemodynamicsPerfusion ImagingReplica TechniquesAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityComputer SimulationCoronary VesselsFluorescent DyesIsolated Heart PreparationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrospheresModels, AnatomicModels, CardiovascularPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood FlowFluorescent DyesCoronary flow modelMicrospheresPerfusion quantificationSkimming

Identifiers

PMID25963318
PMCPMC7611146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.