ArticleMicrovascular research2015
Microsphere skimming in the porcine coronary arteries: Implications for flow quantification.
Article in Microvascular research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal slice thickness for improved accuracy of quantitative analysis of fluorescent cell and microsphere distribution in cryo-images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Pixel-wise assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion using a cardiac phantom mimicking transmural myocardial perfusion gradients.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019Article
- Movement of a finite body in channel flow.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particle skimming is a phenomenon where particles suspended in fluid flowing through vessels distribute disproportionately to bulk fluid volume at junctions. Microspheres are considered a gold standard of intra-organ perfusion measurements and are used widely in studies of flow distribution and quantification. It has previously been hypothesised that skimming at arterial junctions is responsible for a systematic over-estimation of myocardial perfusion from microspheres at the subendocardium. Our objective is to integrate coronary arterial structure and microsphere distribution, imaged at high resolution, to test the hypothesis of microsphere skimming in a porcine left coronary arterial (LCA) network. A detailed network was reconstructed from cryomicrotome imaging data and a Poiseuille flow model was used to simulate flow. A statistical approach using Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals was applied to determine the prevalence of skimming at bifurcations in the LCA. Results reveal that microsphere skimming is most prevalent at bifurcations in the larger coronary arteries, namely the epicardial and transmural arteries. Bifurcations at which skimming was identified have significantly more asymmetric branching parameters. This finding suggests that when using thin transmural segments to quantify flow from microspheres, a skimming-related deposition bias may result in underestimation of perfusion in the subepicardium, and overestimation in the subendocardium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.