Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963191›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2015

A Review of the Use of Iloprost, A Synthetic Prostacyclin, in the Prevention of Radiocontrast Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography and Intervention.

Hayah M Kassis, Kristopher D Minsinger, Peter A McCullough, Clay A Block, Mandeep S Sidhu, Jeremiah R Brown

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hayah M KassisDepartment of Cardiology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kristopher D MinsingerGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Peter A McCulloughDepartment of Cardiology, Baylor Heart and Cardiovascular Institute, Houston, Texas.
Clay A BlockDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Mandeep S SidhuDepartment of Cardiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Jeremiah R BrownThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USAllegheny General Hospital · USCardiovascular Institute of the South · USDartmouth College · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · US

Funding

Patient Safety and Acute Kidney InjuryK01HS018443 · AHRQ · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BROWN, JEREMIAH R · 2009 to 2013
$696k
AHRQ HHS HS018443AHRQ HHS K01 HS018443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, has been effective in preventing renal dysfunction among transplant patients. We hypothesized that iloprost is protective against renal dysfunction in different settings, in which similar underlying mechanisms of nephrotoxicity occur. We conducted a literature review, and discuss the application of iloprost in reducing acute renal insufficiency and the pathophysiological mechanisms of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). One proposed mechanism of CIN is prolonged renal arterial vasoconstriction, causing renal hypoperfusion, ischemia, and release of free radicals. Iloprost is an analogue of the vasodilatory prostaglandin PGI2 . It has demonstrated cytoprotective properties in the renal transplant population by inhibiting lysosomal degradation and release of free radicals, allowing membrane stabilization. Two good-quality studies reported on iloprost and CIN. Five studies reported protective effects of iloprost in renal transplantation and 1 in coronary artery bypass grafting. Iloprost was found to be renoprotective in patients with baseline renal insufficiency who underwent coronary angiography for CIN (risk ratio [RR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.67) and increases the weighted mean difference improvement in creatinine clearance (RR = 4.56, 95% CI: 1.82-7.30). CIN is associated with major adverse cardiac events. Preventing CIN is important for patient safety and reducing disease burden. Iloprost may reduce CIN by up to 68%. The same mechanisms of iloprost that inhibit graft dysfunction in the acute post-renal transplant and cardiopulmonary bypass setting may also contribute to preventing CIN. Large randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine the clinical efficacy of iloprost in the angiography setting.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyHumansIloprostVasodilator AgentsContrast MediaIloprostVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID25963191
PMCPMC6613824
OpenAlexW1866435863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.