Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963094›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2015

Integrating biomarkers in colorectal cancer trials in the West and China.

Sabine Tejpar, Lin Shen, Xicheng Wang, Richard L Schilsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of exosomal long non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabine TejparMolecular Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Lin ShenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital &Institute, 52 Fucheng Street, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China.
Xicheng WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital &Institute, 52 Fucheng Street, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China.
Richard L SchilskyAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, 2318 Mill Road, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of biomarkers that provide information on drug efficacy is recognized as essential for successful and cost-effective treatment of cancer. However, biomarker discovery is difficult, and requires multiple independent studies to identify a target that serves as a suitable predictor of efficacy and to ensure appropriate biomarker validation. Clinical trials that are performed, sometimes sequentially, in Europe, the USA or Asia, are often similar in their design, in part owing to regulatory, marketing, or safety considerations. We believe some of these trials offer additional unique opportunities for biomarker discovery or validation. There are multiple hurdles to overcome, such as homogenous tissue acquisition and analysis, defining and aligning biomarker hypotheses across trials, and the need to adapt sample sizes and trial designs. Nevertheless, we believe that a collaborative engagement of the academic, regulatory and pharmaceutical community can go a long way in addressing these issues and producing more-rapid results in the field of personalized medicine. In this Perspectives, we describe our views on the current fragmented approach to biomarker discovery and validation in relevant trials run within our own regions-that is, Europe, China, and the USA-and hope this article serves as a base for further reflection.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAsiaBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEuropeHumansInternational CooperationPrecision MedicineUnited StatesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.