Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25963031›Full record

ReviewHerz2015

[Myocarditis in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Endomyocardial biopsy or MRI?].

C Besler, G Schuler, P Lurz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C BeslerAbteilung Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Universität Leipzig - Herzzentrum, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
G Schuler
P Lurz
Leipzig University · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart muscle commonly caused by viral pathogens. Dilated cardiomyopathy is a major long-term sequela of myocarditis and at least in part related to post-viral immune-mediated responses. Establishing a diagnosis of myocarditis represents a major challenge because of the variable clinical picture and the lack of readily available, non-invasive diagnostic tests. In recent years, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has emerged as a promising additional diagnostic tool in patients with suspected myocarditis: cMRI not only provides important insights into structural and functional abnormalities of the heart but relevant tissue pathologies can also be visualized. The diagnostic accuracy of three tissue criteria, i.e. the edema ratio, early gadolinium enhancement ratio and late gadolinium enhancement, has been characterized in several studies. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is widely considered to be the reference standard for diagnosis of myocarditis. Although limited by sampling error, EMB is the only diagnostic procedure that can be used to confirm myocarditis. Laboratory analyses of EMB may provide information about specific causes of myocarditis and are, at least in part, of prognostic relevance. In a subset of patients the results of EMB may guide therapeutic decision-making. Additional efforts are needed in cardiac imaging, molecular characterization of EMB and evaluation of serum biomarkers to improve the diagnostic work-up in patients with suspected myocarditis and to identify potential novel targets for a cause-specific therapy of myocarditis.

Indexed as

BiopsyCardiomyopathiesDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocarditisMyocardiumReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25963031
OpenAlexW771077023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.