Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25962589›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Quantifying [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the arterial wall: the effects of dual time-point imaging and partial volume effect correction.

Björn A Blomberg, Arjun Bashyam, Abhinay Ramachandran, Saeid Gholami, Sina Houshmand, Ali Salavati, Tom Werner, Habib Zaidi, Abass Alavi

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observer repeatability and interscan reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride coronary microcalcification activity.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. PET-Based Imaging withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic performance of quantitative and qualitative parameters for the diagnosis of aortic graft infection using [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Volume-based glucose metabolic analysis of FDG PET/CT: The optimum threshold and conditions to suppress physiological myocardial uptake.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  13. What can be and what cannot be accomplished with PET to detect and characterize atherosclerotic plaques.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Björn A BlombergDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands, b.a.blomberg@umcutrecht.nl.
Arjun Bashyam
Abhinay Ramachandran
Saeid Gholami
Sina Houshmand
Ali Salavati
Tom Werner
Habib Zaidi
Abass Alavi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe human arterial wall is smaller than the spatial resolution of current positron emission tomographs. Therefore, partial volume effects should be considered when quantifying arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake. We evaluated the impact of a novel method for partial volume effect (PVE) correction with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) assistance on quantification of arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake at different imaging time-points.

methodsTen subjects were assessed by CECT imaging and dual time-point PET/CT imaging at approximately 60 and 180 min after (18)F-FDG administration. For both time-points, uptake of (18)F-FDG was determined in the aortic wall by calculating the blood pool-corrected maximum standardized uptake value (cSUVMAX) and cSUVMEAN. The PVE-corrected SUVMEAN (pvcSUVMEAN) was also calculated using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT images. Finally, corresponding target-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated.

resultsAt 60 min, pvcSUVMEAN was on average 3.1 times greater than cSUVMAX (P < .0001) and 8.5 times greater than cSUVMEAN (P < .0001). At 180 min, pvcSUVMEAN was on average 2.6 times greater than cSUVMAX (P < .0001) and 6.6 times greater than cSUVMEAN (P < .0001).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that CECT-assisted PVE correction significantly influences quantification of arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake. Therefore, partial volume effects should be considered when quantifying arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake with PET.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAortaBiological TransportContrast MediaFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsContrast MediaFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.