Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25962417›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Characterization of repetitive DNA landscape in wheat homeologous group 4 chromosomes.

Ingrid Garbus, José R Romero, Miroslav Valarik, Hana Vanžurová, Miroslava Karafiátová, Mario Cáccamo, Jaroslav Doležel, Gabriela Tranquilli, Marcelo Helguera, Viviana Echenique

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of Repetitive DNA inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New insights into the wheat chromosome 4D structure and virtual gene order, revealed by survey pyrosequencing.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ingrid GarbusCERZOS (CCT - CONICET Bahía Blanca) and Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina. igarbus@criba.edu.ar.
José R RomeroCERZOS (CCT - CONICET Bahía Blanca) and Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina. jromero@criba.edu.ar.
Miroslav ValarikInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic. valarik@ueb.cas.cz.
Hana VanžurováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic. vanzurova@ueb.cas.cz.
Miroslava KarafiátováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic. karafiatova@ueb.cas.cz.
Mario CáccamoThe Genome Analysis Centre (TGAC), Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. mario.caccamo@tgac.ac.uk.
Jaroslav DoleželInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, CZ-78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic. dolezel@ueb.cas.cz.
Gabriela TranquilliInstituto Recursos Biológicos, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina. tranquilli.gabriela@inta.gob.ar.
Marcelo HelgueraEstación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina. helguera.marcelo@inta.gob.ar.
Viviana EcheniqueCERZOS (CCT - CONICET Bahía Blanca) and Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina. echeniq@criba.edu.ar.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARNorwich Research Park · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number and complexity of repetitive elements varies between species, being in general most represented in those with larger genomes. Combining the flow-sorted chromosome arms approach to genome analysis with second generation DNA sequencing technologies provides a unique opportunity to study the repetitive portion of each chromosome, enabling comparisons among them. Additionally, different sequencing approaches may produce different depth of insight to repeatome content and structure. In this work we analyze and characterize the repetitive sequences of Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring homeologous group 4 chromosome arms, obtained through Roche 454 and Illumina sequencing technologies, hereinafter marked by subscripts 454 and I, respectively. Repetitive sequences were identified with the RepeatMasker software using the interspersed repeat database mips-REdat_v9.0p. The input sequences consisted of our 4DS454 and 4DL454 scaffolds and 4ASI, 4ALI, 4BSI, 4BLI, 4DSI and 4DLI contigs, downloaded from the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC).

resultsRepetitive sequences content varied from 55% to 63% for all chromosome arm assemblies except for 4DLI, in which the repeat content was 38%. Transposable elements, small RNA, satellites, simple repeats and low complexity sequences were analyzed. SSR frequency was found one per 24 to 27 kb for all chromosome assemblies except 4DLI, where it was three times higher. Dinucleotides and trinucleotides were the most abundant SSR repeat units. (GA)n/(TC)n was the most abundant SSR except for 4DLI where the most frequently identified SSR was (CCG/CGG)n. Retrotransposons followed by DNA transposons were the most highly represented sequence repeats, mainly composed of CACTA/En-Spm and Gypsy superfamilies, respectively. This whole chromosome sequence analysis allowed identification of three new LTR retrotransposon families belonging to the Copia superfamily, one belonging to the Gypsy superfamily and two TRIM retrotransposon families. Their physical distribution in wheat genome was analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and one of them, the Carmen retrotransposon, was found specific for centromeric regions of all wheat chromosomes.

conclusionThe presented work is the first deep report of wheat repetitive sequences analyzed at the chromosome arm level, revealing the first insight into the repeatome of T. aestivum chromosomes of homeologous group 4.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantPhysical Chromosome MappingSequence Analysis, DNATriticumDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID25962417
PMCPMC4440537
OpenAlexW1528982447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.