Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25962114›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2015

Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine for Primary Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Retrospective, Single-Institution Study.

Karen Sayal, Ioannis Gounaris, Bristi Basu, Sue Freeman, Penny Moyle, Karen Hosking, Mahesh Iddawela, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Jean Abraham, James Brenton and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Karen Sayal*Department of Oncology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; †Cancer Research United Kingdom Cambridge Institute, University of Cambirdge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; ‡Department of Radiology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; §Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and ∥Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ioannis Gounaris
Bristi Basu
Sue Freeman
Penny Moyle
Karen Hosking
Mahesh Iddawela
Mercedes Jimenez-Linan
Jean Abraham
James Brenton
Helen Hatcher
Helena Earl
Christine Parkinson
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrimary platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an area of unmet medical need. There is limited evidence from small studies that platinum-based combinations can overcome "resistance" in a proportion of patients. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of platinum-based combination chemotherapy in the platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory setting.

methodsEpirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) combination chemotherapy was used at our institution for the treatment of relapsed EOC. From the institutional database, we identified all patients with primary platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant relapse treated with ECX as second-line therapy between 2001 and 2012. We extracted demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data and outcomes. We used logistic and Cox regression models to identify predictors of response and survival respectively.

resultsThirty-four 34 patients (8 refractory, 26 resistant) were treated with ECX. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) response rate was 45%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months, and overall survival (OS) was 10.6 months. Platinum-resistant patients had better outcomes than did platinum-refractory patients (response rate, 54% vs 0%, P = 0.047; PFS 7.2 vs 1.8 months, P < 0.0001; OS 14.4 vs 3 months, P < 0.001). In regression models, time to progression after first-line treatment and platinum-refractory status were the strongest predictors of response and PFS or OS, respectively. Patients with time to progression after first-line treatment longer than 3 months showed PFS and OS of 7.9 and 14.7 months, respectively. Toxicity was manageable, with only 13% of cycles administered at reduced doses.

conclusionsEpirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine seems to be active in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC with manageable toxicity. Further prospective investigation of platinum-anthracycline combinations is warranted in patients who relapse 3 to 6 months after first-line platinum-taxane treatment.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCisplatinCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEndometrial NeoplasmsEpirubicinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessCapecitabineCisplatinEpirubicin

Identifiers

PMID25962114
PMCPMC4485738
OpenAlexW2408436086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.