Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961828›Full record

SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2015

Drug Dosing and Pharmacokinetics in Children With Obesity: A Systematic Review.

Margreet W Harskamp-van Ginkel, Kevin D Hill, Kristian C Becker, Kristian Becker, Daniela Testoni, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez, Daniel Gonzalez, Jeffrey S Barrett, Daniel K Benjamin, David A Siegel and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Pharmacokinetics of Clindamycin in Obese and Nonobese Children.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of Dosing Strategies for Pediatric Drug Products.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Margreet W Harskamp-van GinkelDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina3Academic Medical Center, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kevin D HillDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kristian C BeckerDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kristian Becker
Daniela TestoniDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael Cohen-WolkowiezDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel GonzalezDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina4Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy.
Jeffrey S BarrettDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel K BenjaminDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
David A SiegelEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patricia BanksDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kevin M WattDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network Administrative Core Committee
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · US

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
UNC-Duke Collaborative Clinical Pharmacology Postdoctoral Training Program-Evaluation SupplementT32GM086330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KIM L.R. BROUWER, Daniel Gonzalez · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
Duke CTSA (Composite)KL2TR001115 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis: PK, Safety, and Neurodevelopmental OutcomesR01HD057956 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Mentorship of early-career pediatricians in quantitiative methods and therapeuticK24HD058735 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2009 to 2018
$1.5M
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill ChildrenK23HD075891 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WATT, KEVIN M · 2014 to 2018
$638k
Clinical Practice Data to Aid Narrow Therapeutic Index Drug ClassificationU01FD004858 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2014
$497k
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibiotics in Premature InfantsK23HD064814 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2013
$474k
FDA HHS 1U01FD004858-01FDA HHS U01 FD004858NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001117NICHD NIH HHS 1K23HD064814NICHD NIH HHS 1K24HD058735-05NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD057956-05NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000001GNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000001ZNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003INICHD NIH HHS K23 HD064814NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD075891NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD058735NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057956NIGMS NIH HHS 1T32GM086330-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086330NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM086330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceObesity affects nearly one-sixth of US children and results in alterations to body composition and physiology that can affect drug disposition, possibly leading to therapeutic failure or toxic side effects. The depth of available literature regarding obesity's effect on drug safety, pharmacokinetics, and dosing in obese children is unknown.

objectiveTo perform a systematic literature review describing the current evidence of the effect of obesity on drug disposition in children. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases (January 1, 1970-December 31, 2012) and included studies if they contained data on drug clearance, volume of distribution, or drug concentration in obese children (aged ≤18 years). We compared exposure and weight-normalized volume of distribution and clearance between obese and nonobese children. We explored the association between drug physicochemical properties and clearance and volume of distribution.

findingsTwenty studies met the inclusion criteria and contained pharmacokinetic data for 21 drugs. The median number of obese children studied per drug was 10 (range, 1-112) and ages ranged from newborn to 29 years (1 study described pharmacokinetics in children and adults together). Dosing schema varied and were either a fixed dose (6 [29%]) or based on body weight (10 [48%]) and body surface area (4 [19%]). Clinically significant pharmacokinetic alterations were observed in obese children for 65% (11 of 17) of the studied drugs. Pharmacokinetic alterations resulted in substantial differences in exposure between obese and nonobese children for 38% (5 of 13) of the drugs. We found no association between drug lipophilicity or Biopharmaceutical Drug Disposition Classification System class and changes in volume of distribution or clearance due to obesity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Consensus is lacking on the most appropriate weight-based dosing strategy for obese children. Prospective pharmacokinetic trials in obese children are needed to ensure therapeutic efficacy and enhance drug safety.

Indexed as

Body CompositionBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolDrug Dosage CalculationsHumansMetabolic Clearance RateObesityPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25961828
PMCPMC4494887
OpenAlexW2153688489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.