Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961812›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2015

Symptoms as the main problem in primary care: A cross-sectional study of frequency and characteristics.

Marianne Rosendal, Anders Helles Carlsen, Mette Trøllund Rask, Grete Moth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Identifying patterns of communication in patients attending memory clinics: a systematic review of observations and signs with potential diagnostic utility.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The course and management of symptom diagnoses in general practice.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Follow the microbes: a new perspective on health inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne RosendalResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Denmark.
Anders Helles Carlsen
Mette Trøllund Rask
Grete Moth
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to study symptoms managed as the main problem by the general practitioner (GP) and to describe the frequencies and characteristics of presented symptoms when no specific diagnosis could be made.

designCross- sectional study.

settingGeneral practices in the Central Denmark Region. SUBJECTS: In total, 397 GPs included patients with face-to-face contacts during one randomly assigned day in 2008-2009; 7008 patients were included and 5232 presented with a health problem.

main outcome measuresGPs answered a questionnaire after each patient contact. Symptoms and specific diagnoses were subsequently classified using the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Symptom frequency, comorbidity, consultation length, and GP-assessed final outcome and burden of consultations were analysed.

resultsThe GPs could not establish a specific diagnosis in 36% of patients with health problems. GPs expected that presented symptoms would not result in a future specific diagnosis for half of these patients. Musculoskeletal (lower limb and back) and respiratory (cough) symptoms were most frequent. More GPs had demanding consultations when no specific diagnosis could be made. Higher burden was associated with age, comorbidity, and GP expectancy of persistent symptoms when no diagnosis could be made.

conclusionInterpretation and management of symptoms is a key task in primary care. As symptoms are highly frequent in general practice, symptoms without a specific diagnosis constitute a challenge to GPs. Nevertheless, symptoms have been given little priority in research. More attention should be directed to evidence-based management of symptoms as a generic phenomenon to ensure improved outcomes in the future.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareSymptom AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityCoughCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansCross-sectionalDenmarkdiagnosisgeneral practicemedically unexplained symptoms (non-MESH)primary health caresigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID25961812
PMCPMC4834508
OpenAlexW1744853520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.