Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961634›Full record

ArticleRadiology2015

Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings.

Daniel R Murphy, Eric J Thomas, Ashley N D Meyer, Hardeep Singh

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Responsibility for follow-up during the diagnostic process in primary care: a secondary analysis of International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel R MurphyFrom the Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.); and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.).
Eric J ThomasFrom the Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.); and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.).
Ashley N D MeyerFrom the Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.); and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.).
Hardeep SinghFrom the Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (D.R.M., A.N.D.M., H.S.); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.); and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Tex (E.J.T.).

Funding

Decision Making and Clinical Work of Test Result Follow-up in Health IT SettingsR01HS022087 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Using Electronic Data to Improve Care of Patients with Known or Suspected CancerR18HS017820 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022087AHRQ HHS R18 HS017820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based trigger algorithm to identify delays in follow-up of patients with imaging results that are suggestive of lung cancer and to validate this trigger on retrospective data. Materials and Methods The local institutional review board approved the study. A "trigger" algorithm was developed to automate the detection of delays in diagnostic evaluation of chest computed tomographic (CT) images and conventional radiographs that were electronically flagged by reviewing radiologists as being "suspicious for malignancy." The trigger algorithm was developed through literature review and expert input. It included patients who were alive and 40-70 years old, and it excluded instances in which appropriate timely follow-up (defined as occurring within 30 days) was detected (eg, pulmonary visit) or when follow-up was unnecessary (eg, in patients with a terminal illness). The algorithm was iteratively applied to a retrospective test cohort in an EHR data warehouse at a large Veterans Affairs facility, and manual record reviews were used to validate each individual criterion. The final algorithm aimed at detecting an absence of timely follow-up was retrospectively applied to an independent validation cohort to determine the positive predictive value (PPV). Trigger performance, time to follow-up, reasons for lack of follow-up, and cancer outcomes were analyzed and reported by using descriptive statistics. Results The trigger algorithm was retrospectively applied to the records of 89 168 patients seen between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009. Of 538 records with an imaging report that was flagged as suspicious for malignancy, 131 were identified by the trigger as being high risk for delayed diagnostic evaluation. Manual chart reviews confirmed a true absence of follow-up in 75 cases (trigger PPV of 57.3% for detecting evaluation delays), of which four received a diagnosis of primary lung cancer within the subsequent 2 years. Conclusion EHR-based triggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic evaluation was delayed. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedDelayed DiagnosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25961634
PMCPMC4613876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.