Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Comparison of Methods to Measure Fitness in Escherichia coli.

Michael J Wiser, Richard E Lenski

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elucidation of the growth phenotypes of 82 strains from theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A plasmid with theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Acquisition of plasmids from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains had low or neutral fitness cost on commensal E. coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J WiserBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Richard E LenskiBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to characterize the dynamics of adaptation, it is important to be able to quantify how a population's mean fitness changes over time. Such measurements are especially important in experimental studies of evolution using microbes. The Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) with Escherichia coli provides one such system in which mean fitness has been measured by competing derived and ancestral populations. The traditional method used to measure fitness in the LTEE and many similar experiments, though, is subject to a potential limitation. As the relative fitness of the two competitors diverges, the measurement error increases because the less-fit population becomes increasingly small and cannot be enumerated as precisely. Here, we present and employ two alternatives to the traditional method. One is based on reducing the fitness differential between the competitors by using a common reference competitor from an intermediate generation that has intermediate fitness; the other alternative increases the initial population size of the less-fit, ancestral competitor. We performed a total of 480 competitions to compare the statistical properties of estimates obtained using these alternative methods with those obtained using the traditional method for samples taken over 50,000 generations from one of the LTEE populations. On balance, neither alternative method yielded measurements that were more precise than the traditional method.

Indexed as

Biological AssayBiological EvolutionGenetic FitnessAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabinoseBacterial LoadCulture MediaEscherichia coliGlucoseStress, PhysiologicalArabinoseCulture MediaGlucose

Identifiers

PMID25961572
PMCPMC4427439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.