Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961462›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2015

Mental health problems of undocumented migrants in the Netherlands: A qualitative exploration of recognition, recording, and treatment by general practitioners.

Erik Teunissen, Eric Van Bavel, Francine Van Den Driessen Mareeuw, Anne Macfarlane, Evelyn Van Weel-Baumgarten, Maria Van Den Muijsenbergh, Chris Van Weel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Refugees' Agency: On Resistance, Resilience, and Resources.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Erik TeunissenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands.
Eric Van Bavel
Francine Van Den Driessen Mareeuw
Anne Macfarlane
Evelyn Van Weel-Baumgarten
Maria Van Den Muijsenbergh
Chris Van Weel
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in relation to recognition, recording, and treatment of mental health problems of undocumented migrants (UMs), and to gain insight in the reasons for under-registration of mental health problems in the electronic medical records.

designQualitative study design with semi-structured interviews using a topic guide. SUBJECTS AND

settingSixteen GPs in the Netherlands with clinical expertise in the care of UMs.

resultsGPs recognized many mental health problems in UMs. Barriers that prevented them from recording these problems and from delivering appropriate care were their low consultation rates, physical presentation of mental health problems, high number of other problems, the UM's lack of trust towards health care professionals, and cultural differences in health beliefs and language barriers. Referrals to mental health care organizations were often seen as problematic by GPs. To overcome these barriers, GPs provided personalized care as far as possible, referred to other primary care professionals such as social workers or mental health care nurses in their practice, and were a little less restrictive in prescribing psychotropics than guidelines recommended.

conclusionsGPs experienced a variety of barriers in engaging with UMs when identifying or suspecting mental health problems. This explains why there is a gap between the high recognition of mental health problems and the low recording of these problems in general practice files. It is recommended that GPs address mental health problems more actively, strive for continuity of care in order to gain trust of the UMs, and look for opportunities to provide mental care that is accessible and acceptable for UMs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEmigration and ImmigrationGeneral PractitionersMental Health ServicesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Transients and MigrantsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedGeneral practicemental healthNetherlandsqualitative researchtransients and migrants

Identifiers

PMID25961462
PMCPMC4834507
OpenAlexW2138781376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.