Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961140›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2016

Impact of a multicomponent screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training curriculum on a medical residency program.

Nnenna Kalu, Gloria Cain, TyWanda McLaurin-Jones, Denise Scott, John Kwagyan, Catsim Fassassi, Wendy Greene, Robert E Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nnenna Kalua SBIRT Medical Residency Program , Howard University , Washington , DC , USA.
Gloria Caina SBIRT Medical Residency Program , Howard University , Washington , DC , USA.
TyWanda McLaurin-Jonesb Department of Community and Family Medicine , Howard University , Washington , DC , USA.
Denise Scotta SBIRT Medical Residency Program , Howard University , Washington , DC , USA.
John Kwagyanc Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translation Science (GHUCCTS) , Howard University College of Medicine/Howard University Hospital , Washington , DC , USA.
Catsim Fassassid Howard-Hopkins Surgical Outcomes Research Center , Washington , DC , USA.
Wendy Greenee Howard University Hospital Trauma and Critical Care , Washington , DC , USA.
Robert E Taylora SBIRT Medical Residency Program , Howard University , Washington , DC , USA.
Howard University · USHoward University Hospital · USGeorgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science · US

Funding

Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Risk Factors, Early Detection and Personalized InterventionUL1TR001409 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GONDRE-LEWIS, MARJORIE C, MELLMAN, THOMAS A · 2015 to 2024
$37.8M
PROTEOMICS CORE FACILITYG12MD007597 · NIMHD · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI SOUTHERLAND, WILLIAM M. · 2012 to 2018
$14.8M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1RR031975 · NCRR · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2011
$14.6M
Howard University SBIRT Medical Residency ProgramU79TI020245 · SU · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, ROBERT · 2008 to 2012
–
CSAT SAMHSA HHS 5U79TI020245NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001409NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031975NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance-related disorders are a growing problem in the United States. The patient-provider setting can serve as a crucial environment to detect and prevent at-risk substance use. Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is an integrated approach to deliver early intervention and treatment services for persons who have or are at risk for substance-related disorders. SBIRT training components can include online modules, in-person instruction, practical experience, and clinical skills assessment. This paper will evaluate the impact of multiple modes of training on acquisition of SBIRT skills as observed in a clinical skills assessment.

methodsResidents were part of an SBIRT training program, from 2009 through 2013, consisting of lecture, role-play, online modules, patient encounters, and clinical skills assessment (CSA). Differences were assessed across satisfactory and unsatisfactory CSA performance.

resultsSeventy percent of the residents satisfactorily completed CSA. Demographics, type of components completed, and number of components completed were similar among residents who demonstrated satisfactory clinical skills compared with those who did not. All components of the training program were accepted equally across specialties and resident matriculation cohorts.

conclusionThe authors conclude that the components employed in SBIRT training do not have to be numerous or of a particular mode of training in order to see observable demonstration of SBIRT skills among medical residents. Thus, residency educators who have limited time or resources may utilize as few as 1 mode of training to effectually disseminate SBIRT skills among health care providers. As SBIRT continues to evolve as a promising tool to address at-risk substance-related disorders, it is critical to train medical residents and other health professionals.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyReferral and ConsultationCurriculumHumansPsychotherapy, BriefSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesInternship and residencySBIRTsubstance-related disorderstraining

Identifiers

PMID25961140
PMCPMC5267356
OpenAlexW2293349473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.