Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25961042›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.

Ralf Joukhadar, Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer, Amr Hamza, Julia Radosa, Werner Bader, Dimitri Barski, Fakher Ismaeel, Guenther Schneider, Erich Solomayer, Sascha Baum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02667002 (Randomized Single Blind Controlled Trial of Comparison of Anatomic and Sexual Outcomes Between Conventional and Bilateral Sacral Hysteropexy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02667002 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Single Blind Controlled Trial of Comparison of Anatomic and Sexual Outcomes Between Conventional and Bilateral Sacral Hysteropexy

TypeinterventionalSponsorZeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training HospitalRan2015 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsBilateral Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy, Conventional abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy, Nulliparous women with no uterovaginal prolapsed
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AbsorbaTackArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A sequential comparison of postoperative voiding function between two different transobturator sling procedures.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ralf JoukhadarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-480X
Gabriele Meyberg-SolomayerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Amr HamzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-0593
Julia RadosaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Werner BaderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Teutoburger Straße 50, 33604 Bielefeld, Germany.
Dimitri BarskiDepartment of Urology, Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH, Preußenstraße 84, 41464 Neuss, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8611-8250
Fakher IsmaeelDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK), Mittelallee 9, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4653-9653
Guenther SchneiderDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Erich SolomayerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.
Sascha BaumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Homburg, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66424 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6057-6042
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DELukaskrankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSacropexy is a generally applied treatment of prolapse, yet there are known possible complications of it. An essential need exists for better alloplastic materials.

methodsBetween April 2013 and June 2014, we performed a modified laparoscopic bilateral sacropexy (MLBS) in 10 patients using a MRI-visible PVDF mesh implant. Selected patients had prolapse POP-Q stages II-III and concomitant OAB. We studied surgery-related morbidity, anatomical and functional outcome, and mesh-visibility in MRI. Mean follow-up was 7.4 months.

resultsConcomitant colporrhaphy was conducted in 1/10 patients. Anatomical success was defined as POP-Q stage 0-I. Apical success rate was 100% and remained stable. A recurrent cystocele was seen in 1/10 patients during follow-up without need for intervention. Out of 6 (6/10) patients with preoperative SUI, 5/6 were healed and 1/6 persisted. De-novo SUI was seen in 1/10 patients. Complications requiring a relaparoscopy were seen in 2/10 patients. 8/10 patients with OAB were relieved postoperatively. The first in-human magnetic resonance visualization of a prolapse mesh implant was performed and showed good quality of visualization.

conclusionMLBS is a feasible and safe procedure with favorable anatomical and functional outcome and good concomitant healing rates of SUI and OAB. Prospective data and larger samples are required.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25961042
PMCPMC4417564
OpenAlexW2026318987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.