Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25960938›Full record

ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2015

Bridging Levels of Understanding in Schizophrenia Through Computational Modeling.

Alan Anticevic, John D Murray, Deanna M Barch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dissociable Disruptions in Thalamic and Hippocampal Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Youth with 22q11.2 Deletions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Biophysical Modeling of Large-Scale Brain Dynamics and Applications for Computational Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan AnticevicDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University ; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism, New Haven, Connecticut ; Abraham Ribicoff Research Facilities, Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven.
John D MurrayCenter for Neural Science, New York University.
Deanna M BarchDepartment of Psychology and Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.

Funding

Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications ConsortiumR01MH084840 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Deanna Barch, Cameron S. Carter · 2008 to 2026
$8.5M
Recurrent Neual Circuit Basis of Time Integration and Decision MakingR01MH062349 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAO-JING · 2001 to 2022
$7.2M
Characterizing Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia via Computational Modeling aDP5OD012109 · OD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTICEVIC, ALAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIH HHS DP5 OD012109NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062349NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is an illness with a remarkably complex symptom presentation that has thus far been out of reach of neuroscientific explanation. This presents a fundamental problem for developing better treatments that target specific symptoms or root causes. One promising path forward is the incorporation of computational neuroscience, which provides a way to formalize experimental observations and, in turn, make theoretical predictions for subsequent studies. We review three complementary approaches: (a) biophysically based models developed to test cellular-level and synaptic hypotheses, (b) connectionist models that give insight into large-scale neural-system-level disturbances in schizophrenia, and (c) models that provide a formalism for observations of complex behavioral deficits, such as negative symptoms. We argue that harnessing all of these modeling approaches represents a productive approach for better understanding schizophrenia. We discuss how blending these approaches can allow the field to progress toward a more comprehensive understanding of schizophrenia and its treatment.

Indexed as

cognitive deficitscomputational modelingschizophreniasymptomssystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID25960938
PMCPMC4421907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.