Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25960807›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2015

(13)CO2 breath tests in non-invasive hepatological diagnosis.

Joanna Musialik, Krzysztof Jonderko, Anna Kasicka-Jonderko, Magdalena Buschhaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna MusialikDepartment of Basic Biomedical Science, School of Pharmacy in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Krzysztof JonderkoDepartment of Basic Biomedical Science, School of Pharmacy in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Anna Kasicka-JonderkoDepartment of Basic Biomedical Science, School of Pharmacy in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Magdalena BuschhausCentre for Therapeutic Discovery, Medical Research Council Technology, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In liver diagnostics, a simple, non-invasive test with high sensitivity and specificity is permanently being sought in order to assess the degree of liver damage. In addition to liver biopsy, algorithms using blood parameters or elastometry are used in clinical practice. However, these methods do not provide information about the true liver reserve, so the liver breath test seem to be a promising diagnostic tool. The basis of this test depends on the ability of particular hepatocyte enzyme systems to metabolise a tested substance labelled with a stable carbon isotope. The kinetics of (13)CO2 elimination with expiratory air then permits quantitative assessment of the functional liver reserve and the degree of organ damage. In this paper the most commonly used tests, grouped according to the main metabolic pathways, are described. The usefulness of liver breath tests in specific clinical situations, both as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, is presented.

Indexed as

13Cbreath testsisotope application in medicineliver diseases diagnosticsstable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID25960807
PMCPMC4411407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.