Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25960725›Full record

ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Tumor Bed Boost Integration during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Review of the Current Evidence.

Pierfrancesco Franco, Domenico Cante, Piera Sciacero, Giuseppe Girelli, Maria Rosa La Porta, Umberto Ricardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierfrancesco FrancoDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Domenico CanteRadiation Oncology Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, ASLTO4, Ivrea, Italy.
Piera SciaceroRadiation Oncology Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, ASLTO4, Ivrea, Italy.
Giuseppe GirelliRadiation Oncology Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, ASLTO4, Ivrea, Italy.
Maria Rosa La PortaRadiation Oncology Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, ASLTO4, Ivrea, Italy.
Umberto RicardiDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy delivered with hypofractionation, which involves the delivery of a higher dose per fraction in fewer fractions (generally with a lower total nominal dose) over a shorter overall treatment time, is an established therapeutic option at least for a selected group of early breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Optimal delivery of the tumor bed boost dose in terms of timing, fractionation, and total dose whenever a hypofractionated schedule is employed has yet to be established. We herein present a review of the current evidence on the role of boost integration in whole breast radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapyBreast cancerConcomitant boostHypofractionationIGRTIMRTSimultaneous integrated boost

Identifiers

PMID25960725
PMCPMC4395817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.