Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25960294›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2015

Role of Aquaporin 0 in lens biomechanics.

S Sindhu Kumari, Neha Gupta, Alan Shiels, Paul G FitzGerald, Anil G Menon, Richard T Mathias, Kulandaiappan Varadaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CatExperimental eye research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Functional characterization of CatExperimental eye research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Anticataract Effect of the Aqueous Extract of the Flowers ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S Sindhu KumariPhysiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Neha GuptaPhysiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Alan ShielsWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Paul G FitzGeraldCell Biology and Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Anil G MenonUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Richard T MathiasPhysiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; SUNY Eye Institute, NY, USA.
Kulandaiappan VaradarajPhysiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; SUNY Eye Institute, NY, USA. Electronic address: kulandaiappan.varadaraj@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
HUMAN LENS CONNEXIN GENES IN HEREDITARY CATARACTR01EY012284 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIELS, ALAN · 1998 to 2014
$5.4M
VOLUME REGULATION IN NORMAL AND CATARACTOUS LENSESR01EY006391 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MATHIAS, RICHARD T · 1985 to 2014
$5.4M
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF OCULAR LENS BEADED FILAMENTSR01EY008747 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI FITZGERALD, PAUL GILLESPIE · 1990 to 2010
$4.5M
EPH-RECEPTOR SIGNALING IN LENS DEVELOPMENT AND AGINGR01EY023549 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIELS, ALAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Role of Aquaporin-0 for cell-to-cell adhesion and lens transparencyR01EY020506 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI VARADARAJ, KULANDAIAPPAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006391NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008747NEI NIH HHS R01 EY-012284NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012284NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020506NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023549NEI NIH HHS R01 EY06391NEI NIH HHS R01 EY08747NEI NIH HHS R01 EY20506NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE13825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of proper biomechanics of the eye lens is important for its structural integrity and for the process of accommodation to focus near and far objects. Several studies have shown that specialized cytoskeletal systems such as the beaded filament (BF) and spectrin-actin networks contribute to mammalian lens biomechanics; mutations or deletion in these proteins alters lens biomechanics. Aquaporin 0 (AQP0), which constitutes ∼45% of the total membrane proteins of lens fiber cells, has been shown to function as a water channel and a structural cell-to-cell adhesion (CTCA) protein. Our recent ex vivo study on AQP0 knockout (AQP0 KO) mouse lenses showed the CTCA function of AQP0 could be crucial for establishing the refractive index gradient. However, biomechanical studies on the role of AQP0 are lacking. The present investigation used wild type (WT), AQP5 KO (AQP5(-/-)), AQP0 KO (heterozygous KO: AQP0(+/-); homozygous KO: AQP0(-/-); all in C57BL/6J) and WT-FVB/N mouse lenses to learn more about the role of fiber cell AQPs in lens biomechanics. Electron microscopic images exhibited decreases in lens fiber cell compaction and increases in extracellular space due to deletion of even one allele of AQP0. Biomechanical assay revealed that loss of one or both alleles of AQP0 caused a significant reduction in the compressive load-bearing capacity of the lenses compared to WT lenses. Conversely, loss of AQP5 did not alter the lens load-bearing ability. Compressive load-bearing at the suture area of AQP0(+/-) lenses showed easy separation while WT lens suture remained intact. These data from KO mouse lenses in conjunction with previous studies on lens-specific BF proteins (CP49 and filensin) suggest that AQP0 and BF proteins could act co-operatively in establishing normal lens biomechanics. We hypothesize that AQP0, with its prolific expression at the fiber cell membrane, could provide anchorage for cytoskeletal structures like BFs and together they help to confer fiber cell shape, architecture and integrity. To our knowledge, this is the first report identifying the involvement of an aquaporin in lens biomechanics. Since accommodation is required in human lenses for proper focusing, alteration in the adhesion and/or water channel functions of AQP0 could contribute to presbyopia.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquaporinsBiomechanical PhenomenaEye ProteinsLens, CrystallineMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPolymerase Chain Reactionaquaporin 0AquaporinsEye ProteinsAccommodationAQP0CP49FilensinLens biomechanicsPresbyopia

Identifiers

PMID25960294
PMCPMC4461499
OpenAlexW646206248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.