Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25960144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Targets of drugs are generally, and targets of drugs having side effects are specifically good spreaders of human interactome perturbations.

Áron R Perez-Lopez, Kristóf Z Szalay, Dénes Türei, Dezső Módos, Katalin Lenti, Tamás Korcsmáros, Peter Csermely

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Áron R Perez-LopezDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Semmelweis University, P.O. Box 260, H-1444 Budapest 8, Hungary.
Kristóf Z SzalayDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Semmelweis University, P.O. Box 260, H-1444 Budapest 8, Hungary.
Dénes TüreiDepartment of Genetics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s. 1C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Dezső Módos1] Department of Genetics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s. 1C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary [2] Department of Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Vas u. 17, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin LentiDepartment of Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Vas u. 17, H-1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás Korcsmáros1] Department of Genetics, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány P. s. 1C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary [2] TGAC, The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, UK [3] Gut Health and Food Safety Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK.
Peter CsermelyDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Semmelweis University, P.O. Box 260, H-1444 Budapest 8, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUEötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network-based methods are playing an increasingly important role in drug design. Our main question in this paper was whether the efficiency of drug target proteins to spread perturbations in the human interactome is larger if the binding drugs have side effects, as compared to those which have no reported side effects. Our results showed that in general, drug targets were better spreaders of perturbations than non-target proteins, and in particular, targets of drugs with side effects were also better spreaders of perturbations than targets of drugs having no reported side effects in human protein-protein interaction networks. Colorectal cancer-related proteins were good spreaders and had a high centrality, while type 2 diabetes-related proteins showed an average spreading efficiency and had an average centrality in the human interactome. Moreover, the interactome-distance between drug targets and disease-related proteins was higher in diabetes than in colorectal cancer. Our results may help a better understanding of the network position and dynamics of drug targets and disease-related proteins, and may contribute to develop additional, network-based tests to increase the potential safety of drug candidates.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsProtein Interaction MapsColorectal NeoplasmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansNeoplasm ProteinsTime FactorsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25960144
PMCPMC4426692
OpenAlexW2140141454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.