Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25959618›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research

Integrating frequency and magnitude information in decision-making in schizophrenia: An account of patient performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.

Elliot C Brown, Samantha M Hack, James M Gold, William T Carpenter, Bernard A Fischer, Kristen P Prentice, James A Waltz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Altered risky decision making in patients with early non-affective psychosis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot C BrownMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Samantha M HackVeterans Affairs Capital Network (VISN 5) Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
James M GoldMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William T CarpenterMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Veterans Affairs Capital Network (VISN 5) Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bernard A FischerMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Veterans Affairs Capital Network (VISN 5) Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kristen P PrenticeMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James A WaltzMaryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jwaltz@mprc.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USVA Capitol Health Care Network · US

Funding

RESEARCH ETHICS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH058898 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARPENTER, WILLIAM T. · 1999 to 2008
$3.5M
Neurocomputational and fMRI Studies of Motivational Deficits in SchizophreniaR01MH094460 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WALTZ, JAMES A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058898NIMH NIH HHS R01MH058898NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094460NIMH NIH HHS R01MH094460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; Bechara et al., 1994) has frequently been used to assess risky decision making in clinical populations, including patients with schizophrenia (SZ). Poor performance on the IGT is often attributed to reduced sensitivity to punishment, which contrasts with recent findings from reinforcement learning studies in schizophrenia.

methodsIn order to investigate possible sources of IGT performance deficits in SZ patients, we combined data from the IGT from 59 SZ patients and 43 demographically-matched controls with data from the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) in the same participants. Our analyses sought to specifically uncover the role of punishment sensitivity and delineate the capacity to integrate frequency and magnitude information in decision-making under risk.

resultsAlthough SZ patients, on average, made more choices from disadvantageous decks than controls did on the IGT, they avoided decks with frequent punishments at a rate similar to controls. Patients also exhibited excessive loss-avoidance behavior on the BART.

conclusionsWe argue that, rather than stemming from reduced sensitivity to negative consequences, performance deficits on the IGT in SZ patients are more likely the result of a reinforcement learning deficit, specifically involving the integration of frequencies and magnitudes of rewards and punishments in the trial-by-trial estimation of expected value.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSchizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentAdultAntipsychotic AgentsFemaleGamblingHumansIowaMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsDecision-makingIowa Gambling Task (IGT)ReinforcementRewardRiskSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID25959618
PMCPMC4458199
OpenAlexW2061130171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.