Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25958312›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Homologues of potato chromosome 5 show variable collinearity in the euchromatin, but dramatic absence of sequence similarity in the pericentromeric heterochromatin.

Jan M de Boer, Erwin Datema, Xiaomin Tang, Theo J A Borm, Erin H Bakker, Herman J van Eck, Roeland C H J van Ham, Hans de Jong, Richard G F Visser, Christian W B Bachem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A high-quality, haplotype-phased genome reconstruction reveals unexpected haplotype diversity in a pearl oyster.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regeneration ofPlant physiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan M de BoerWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Jan.de.Boer@AVEBE.COM.
Erwin DatemaWageningen University and Research Centre, Applied Bioinformatics, Plant Research International, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. erwin.datema@keygene.com.
Xiaomin TangLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. xiaomintang2013@hotmail.com.
Theo J A BormWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. theo@borm.org.
Erin H BakkerLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. erin_bakker@borm.org.
Herman J van EckWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Herman.vanEck@wur.nl.
Roeland C H J van HamWageningen University and Research Centre, Applied Bioinformatics, Plant Research International, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. roeland.van-ham@keygene.com.
Hans de JongLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. hans.dejong@wur.nl.
Richard G F VisserWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Richard.Visser@wur.nl.
Christian W B BachemWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. christian.bachem@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NLAveris Seeds (Netherlands) · NLKeyGene (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn flowering plants it has been shown that de novo genome assemblies of different species and genera show a significant drop in the proportion of alignable sequence. Within a plant species, however, it is assumed that different haplotypes of the same chromosome align well. In this paper we have compared three de novo assemblies of potato chromosome 5 and report on the sequence variation and the proportion of sequence that can be aligned.

resultsFor the diploid potato clone RH89-039-16 (RH) we produced two linkage phase controlled and haplotype-specific assemblies of chromosome 5 based on BAC-by-BAC sequencing, which were aligned to each other and compared to the 52 Mb chromosome 5 reference sequence of the doubled monoploid clone DM 1-3 516 R44 (DM). We identified 17.0 Mb of non-redundant sequence scaffolds derived from euchromatic regions of RH and 38.4 Mb from the pericentromeric heterochromatin. For 32.7 Mb of the RH sequences the correct position and order on chromosome 5 was determined, using genetic markers, fluorescence in situ hybridisation and alignment to the DM reference genome. This ordered fraction of the RH sequences is situated in the euchromatic arms and in the heterochromatin borders. In the euchromatic regions, the sequence collinearity between the three chromosomal homologs is good, but interruption of collinearity occurs at nine gene clusters. Towards and into the heterochromatin borders, absence of collinearity due to structural variation was more extensive and was caused by hemizygous and poorly aligning regions of up to 450 kb in length. In the most central heterochromatin, a total of 22.7 Mb sequence from both RH haplotypes remained unordered. These RH sequences have very few syntenic regions and represent a non-alignable region between the RH and DM heterochromatin haplotypes of chromosome 5.

conclusionsOur results show that among homologous potato chromosomes large regions are present with dramatic loss of sequence collinearity. This stresses the need for more de novo reference assemblies in order to capture genome diversity in this crop. The discovery of three highly diverged pericentric heterochromatin haplotypes within one species is a novelty in plant genome analysis. The possible origin and cytogenetic implication of this heterochromatin haplotype diversity are discussed.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialEuchromatinGenetic LinkageGenotypeHaplotypesHeterochromatinIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePolymorphism, GeneticSolanum tuberosumEuchromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID25958312
PMCPMC4470070
OpenAlexW1888553477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.