Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957789›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Increased risk of second primary malignancies following uterine cancer: a population-based study in Taiwan over a 30-year period.

Kuan-Der Lee, Chao-Yu Chen, Huei-Jean Huang, Ting-Yao Wang, David Teng, Shih-Hao Huang, Chyong-Huey Lai, Min-Chi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The association between histological subtype of a first primary endometrial cancer and second cancer risk.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kuan-Der LeeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. kdlee@cgmh.org.tw.
Chao-Yu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. b9002031@adm.cgmh.org.tw.
Huei-Jean HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. hueijean.huang@gmail.com.
Ting-Yao WangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. tywang.onco@gmail.com.
David TengDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. david.d.teng@gmail.com.
Shih-Hao HuangBiostatistics Consulting Center and Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. shi.hao@msa.hinet.net.
Chyong-Huey LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. sh46erry@ms6.hinet.net.
Min-Chi ChenBiostatistics Consulting Center and Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. mcc@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
Chang Gung University · TWLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies assessing second primary malignancies (SPMs) after uterine cancer have been conducted in Western populations with conflicting results. This study aimed to define the incidence and risk of SPMs in Taiwanese patients with an initial diagnosis of uterine cancer.

methodsUsing population-based data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry for the period 1979-2008, we quantified standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) among 11,571 women with an initial diagnosis of uterine cancer.

resultsAmong the 11,571 women, 555 (4.80%) developed at least one SPM during 69,987 person-years of follow-up. There was a 71% increased risk of SPM following uterine cancer (SIR=1.71, 95% CI, 1.57-1.86), with higher risks in the vagina/vulva (SIR=9.06), small intestine (SIR=8.45), ovary (SIR=4.15), urinary bladder (SIR=2.31), kidney (SIR=2.24), colorectum (SIR=2.24), lung (SIR=1.96), and breast (SIR=1.43). The risk of SPM was found to be the highest within the first 5 years after diagnosis of uterine cancer, with surveillance bias possibly contributing to the extremely high risk observed in the first follow-up year. The overall risk and pattern of SPM development observed in this study differed from those previously reported in Western populations, possibly because of the methodology and shorter follow-up period employed in this study. The cumulative incidence of SPMs was significantly higher in older patients (≥50 years) than in younger patients (P<0.001).

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study in an Asian population to report 71% increased risk in SPMs in women previously diagnosed with uterine cancer. A younger age at diagnosis of uterine cancer conferred an increased risk of second malignancies, and SPMs worsened survivorship in patients who survived uterine cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAsian PeopleFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRegistriesRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTaiwanTime FactorsUterine Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25957789
PMCPMC4469104
OpenAlexW1885080207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.