ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2015
Low-grade ependymoma with late metastasis: autopsy case study and literature review.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Nomogram incorporating preoperative MRI-VASARI features for differentiating intracranial extraventricular ependymoma from glioblastoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Outcome predictors in the management of intramedullary classic ependymoma: An integrative survival analysis.Medicine · 2018Observational
- Cancer Metastases: So Close and So Far.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEpendymoma metastasis occurs usually along with local recurrence within 7 years after the initial diagnosis. Later spinal metastasis without local recurrence after the surgical resection has been rarely reported in patients with low-grade ependymomas but not with high-grade ependymomas. Here, we present a case with autopsy revealing late extensive supratentorial metastasis of a fourth ventricle classic WHO grade II ependymoma with no local recurrence or spinal metastasis.
methodsA 4-year-old boy underwent a gross total resection (GTR) of the fourth ventricle ependymoma and postoperative radiation therapy. Follow-up MRI showed no recurrence for the next 7 years, but a half year later, extra-axial tumors in the left cerebellopontine angle and right frontal lobe were observed. GTR of the left cerebellopontine angle ependymoma was performed, followed by additional radiation therapy.
resultsHe was stable for the following 2 years before MRI revealed growth of the right frontal tumor and new lesions. GTR of the right frontal tumor demonstrated similar pathologic features of ependymoma. Despite chemotherapy, follow-up MRIs exhibited increasing numbers and sizes of supratentorial tumors but no infratentorial or spinal tumors. He died 15 years after the initial diagnosis. Postmortem brain examination confirmed the supratentorial subarachnoid dissemination with multifocal metastases of classic ependymomas but no recurrence at the infratentorial sites.
conclusionOur case study and literature review suggest that low-grade ependymomas under the current WHO classification have the risk of late metastasis. Therefore, long-term follow-up of the whole neuroaxis is more important for the patients with low-grade ependymomas even in the absence of local recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.