Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957680›Full record

ReviewCell2015

Making sense of transcription networks.

Trevor R Sorrells, Alexander D Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. mSphere · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An integrated transcription factor framework for Treg identity and diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ancient transcriptional regulators can easily evolve new pair-wise cooperativity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trevor R SorrellsDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Alexander D JohnsonDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics and Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: ajohnson@cgl.ucsf.edu.

Funding

MECHANISMS OF YEAST TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATORSR01GM037049 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSON, ALEXANDER D · 1986 to 2024
$9.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When transcription regulatory networks are compared among distantly related eukaryotes, a number of striking similarities are observed: a larger-than-expected number of genes, extensive overlapping connections, and an apparently high degree of functional redundancy. It is often assumed that the complexity of these networks represents optimized solutions, precisely sculpted by natural selection; their common features are often asserted to be adaptive. Here, we discuss support for an alternative hypothesis: the common structural features of transcription networks arise from evolutionary trajectories of "least resistance"--that is, the relative ease with which certain types of network structures are formed during their evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBiofilmsEmbryonic Stem CellsFungiGene Expression RegulationPlants

Identifiers

PMID25957680
PMCPMC4531093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.