Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957612›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Jean Brihault, Alessandro Navacchia, Silvia Pianigiani, Luc Labey, Ronny De Corte, Valerio Pascale, Bernardo Innocenti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Finite element analysis of tibial and femoral resection configurations on varus alignment in total knee arthroplasty].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High congruency MB insert design: stabilizing knee joint even with PCL deficiency.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean BrihaultFaculté de Médicine, Université F. Rabelais, Tours, France.
Alessandro NavacchiaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. alessandro.navacchia@du.edu.
Silvia PianigianiIRCCS, Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Luc LabeyEuropean Centre for Knee Research, Smith&Nephew, Louvain, Belgium.
Ronny De CorteEuropean Centre for Knee Research, Smith&Nephew, Louvain, Belgium.
Valerio PascaleIRCCS, Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Bernardo InnocentiEuropean Centre for Knee Research, Smith&Nephew, Louvain, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost total knee arthroplasty tibial components are metal-backed, but an alternative tibial component made entirely of polyethylene (all-polyethylene design) exists. While several clinical studies have shown that all-poly design performs similarly to the metal-backed, the objective of this study is to perform a biomechanical comparison.

methodsLoads, constraints and geometries during a squat activity at 120° of flexion were obtained from a validated musculoskeletal model and applied to a finite element model. Stresses in the tibia and micromotions at the bone-implant interface were evaluated for several implant configurations: (1) three different thicknesses of the cement penetration under the baseplate (2, 3 and 4 mm), (2) the presence or absence of a cement layer around the stem of the tibial tray and (3) three different bone conditions (physiological, osteopenic and osteoporotic bone).

resultsAll-polyethylene tibial components resulted in significantly higher (p < 0.001) and more uneven stress distributions in the cancellous bone under the baseplate (peak difference: +128.4 %) and fivefold increased micromotions (p < 0.001). Performance of both implant designs worsened with poorer bone quality with peaks in stress and micromotion variations of +40.8 and +54.0 %, respectively (p < 0.001). Performance improvements when the stem was cemented were not statistically significant (n.s.).

conclusionThe metal-backed design showed better biomechanical performance during a squat activity at 120° of flexion compared to the all-polyethylene design. These results should be considered when selecting the appropriate tibial component for a patient, especially in the presence of osteoporotic bone or if intense physical activity is foreseen.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisPolyethyleneProsthesis DesignTibiaBiomechanical PhenomenaBone CementsBone Diseases, MetabolicFinite Element AnalysisHumansMetalsModels, AnatomicOsteoporosisRange of Motion, ArticularBone CementsMetalsPolyethyleneAll-polyethyleneImplant micromotionsMetal-backedTibial stressesTKA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.