Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957486›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2015

Chromatin plasticity in response to DNA damage: The shape of things to come.

Salomé Adam, Juliette Dabin, Sophie E Polo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Regulation of Nuclear Mechanics and the Impact on DNA Damage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Histone chaperone networks shaping chromatin function.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salomé AdamEpigenome Integrity Group, UMR 7216 CNRS/Paris Diderot University, 35 rue Helene Brion, 75013 Paris, France; Chromatin Dynamics Group, UMR 3664 CNRS/Institut Curie Research Center, 26 rue d'Ulm 75005 Paris, France.
Juliette DabinEpigenome Integrity Group, UMR 7216 CNRS/Paris Diderot University, 35 rue Helene Brion, 75013 Paris, France.
Sophie E PoloEpigenome Integrity Group, UMR 7216 CNRS/Paris Diderot University, 35 rue Helene Brion, 75013 Paris, France. Electronic address: sophie.polo@univ-paris-diderot.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 336427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage poses a major threat to cell function and viability by compromising both genome and epigenome integrity. The DNA damage response indeed operates in the context of chromatin and relies on dynamic changes in chromatin organization. Here, we review the molecular bases of chromatin alterations in response to DNA damage, focusing on core histone mobilization in mammalian cells. Building on our current view of nucleosome dynamics in response to DNA damage, we highlight open challenges and avenues for future development. In particular, we discuss the different levels of regulation of chromatin plasticity during the DNA damage response and their potential impact on cell function and epigenome maintenance.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairAnimalsCell CycleChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNAEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesHumansMolecular ChaperonesNucleosomesSignal TransductionDNAHistonesMolecular ChaperonesNucleosomesChromatin dynamicsChromatin remodelersDNA damage repairEpigenome maintenanceHistone chaperonesHistone variants

Identifiers

PMID25957486
PMCPMC5111726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.