ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Electronic health record innovations for healthier patients and happier doctors.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Method to engage invested partners to co-create feasible and sustainable approaches to design and implement cancer prevention and control tools.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Suicide Screening, Risk Assessment, and Lethal Means Counseling During Zero Suicide Implementation.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Associations between blood pressure control and clinical events suggestive of nutrition care documented in electronic health records of patients with hypertension.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Use of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) in Gerontology: Benefits, Considerations and a Promising Future.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Review
- Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Intensification to injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes: mixed methods study (protocol).BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Improving Primary Care Provider Practices in Youth Concussion Management.Clinical pediatrics · 2017Article
- Impact of Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Training for Residents Preparing for Practice in Patient-Centered Medical Homes.The Permanente journal · 2017Article
- Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This special issue explores a range of health information technology (HIT) issues that can help primary care practices and patients. Findings address the design of HIT systems, primarily electronic health records (EHRs), the utility of various functionalities, and implementation strategies that ensure the greatest value. The articles also remind us that, while HIT can support the delivery of care, it is not a panacea. To be effective, functionality needs to be relevant and timely for both the clinician and patient. Prompts and better documentation can improve care, and "prompt fatigue" is not inevitable. Information presented within EHRs needs to be actionable. There is an ongoing tension between information overload and the right-and helpful-information. Even the order of presentation of information can make a difference in the outcome. Whether supported by HIT or not, basic tenants of care, such as including the whole care team in trainings, communicating with other providers, and engaging patients, remain essential. The studies in this issue will prove useful for informatics developers, practices and health systems making HIT decisions, and care teams refining HIT to support the needs of their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.