Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957322›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2016

Determinants of intravaginal practices among HIV-infected women in Zambia using conjoint analysis.

Maria L Alcaide, Ryan Cook, Maureen Chisembele, Emeria Malupande, Deborah L Jones

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03134924 (Vaginal Practices in Human Immunodeficiency Virus), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03134924 nacompletednot on this map

Vaginal Practices in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Positive Women in Zambia, a Bio-Behavioral Intervention "WASH-2"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MiamiRan2013 to 2014Enrolled128ConditionsVaginosis, BacterialArmsWomen's and Sexual Health [WASH], Enhanced Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria L AlcaideDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA malcaide@med.miami.edu.
Ryan CookDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA.
Maureen ChisembeleUniversity of Zambia, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Emeria MalupandeUniversity of Zambia, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Deborah L JonesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA.
University of Miami · USUniversity Teaching Hospital · ZM

Funding

University of Miami Developmental Center for AIDS Research (D-CFAR)P30AI073961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ALLAN E RODRIGUEZ · 2007 to 2026
$33.8M
Vaginal practices in HIV positive women in Zambia a bio-behavioral interventionK23HD074489 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ALCAIDE, MARIA LUISA · 2012 to 2016
$532k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI073961NIAID NIH HHS P30AI073961NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD074489NICHD NIH HHS K23HD074489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravaginal practices (IVPs) are associated with an increased risk of bacterial vaginosis and may play a role in HIV transmission. The objective of this study was to identify the importance of factors underlying the decision to engage in IVP using conjoint analysis; a novel statistical technique used to quantify health-related decisions. This study was a cross-sectional study. HIV-infected women in Zambia completed audio computer-administered self-interview questionnaires assessing demographic, risk factors and IVPs. Reasons for engaging in IVPs were explored using conjoint questionnaires. Conjoint analysis was used to identify the relative importance of factors for engaging in IVPs. Results of the conjoint analysis demonstrated that hygiene was the most important reason for engaging in IVPs (mean importance score = 61, SD = 24.3) followed by partner's preference (mean importance score = 20, SD = 14.4) and health (mean importance score = 17, SD = 13.5). When making the decision to engage in IVPs, women rank the importance of hygiene, partner preference and health differently, according to their personal characteristics. The use of conjoint analysis to define the characteristics of women more likely to engage in specific practices should be used to develop tailored rather than standardised IVP interventions, and such interventions should be incorporated into clinical practice and women's health programmes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSexual PartnersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansHygieneMiddle AgedMotivationPrevalenceRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAfricabacterial vaginosisconjoint analysisHIVintravaginal practicesWomen

Identifiers

PMID25957322
PMCPMC5461823
OpenAlexW2314416634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.