Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957318›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2015

Soup to Tree: The Phylogeny of Beetles Inferred by Mitochondrial Metagenomics of a Bornean Rainforest Sample.

Alex Crampton-Platt, Martijn J T N Timmermans, Matthew L Gimmel, Sujatha Narayanan Kutty, Timothy D Cockerill, Chey Vun Khen, Alfried P Vogler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drawing mitochondrial genomes with circularMT.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Four New Species ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  19. Next-Generation Sequencing of Four Mitochondrial Genomes ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex Crampton-PlattDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Faculty of Life Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom a.crampton-platt@nhm.ac.uk a.vogler@imperial.ac.uk.
Martijn J T N TimmermansDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Matthew L GimmelDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Education, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Sujatha Narayanan KuttyDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy D CockerillDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chey Vun KhenEntomology Section, Forest Research Centre, Forestry Department, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia.
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, United Kingdom a.crampton-platt@nhm.ac.uk a.vogler@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of the growth of molecular ecology, systematics and next-generation sequencing, the discovery and analysis of diversity is not currently integrated with building the tree-of-life. Tropical arthropod ecologists are well placed to accelerate this process if all specimens obtained through mass-trapping, many of which will be new species, could be incorporated routinely into phylogeny reconstruction. Here we test a shotgun sequencing approach, whereby mitochondrial genomes are assembled from complex ecological mixtures through mitochondrial metagenomics, and demonstrate how the approach overcomes many of the taxonomic impediments to the study of biodiversity. DNA from approximately 500 beetle specimens, originating from a single rainforest canopy fogging sample from Borneo, was pooled and shotgun sequenced, followed by de novo assembly of complete and partial mitogenomes for 175 species. The phylogenetic tree obtained from this local sample was highly similar to that from existing mitogenomes selected for global coverage of major lineages of Coleoptera. When all sequences were combined only minor topological changes were induced against this reference set, indicating an increasingly stable estimate of coleopteran phylogeny, while the ecological sample expanded the tip-level representation of several lineages. Robust trees generated from ecological samples now enable an evolutionary framework for ecology. Meanwhile, the inclusion of uncharacterized samples in the tree-of-life rapidly expands taxon and biogeographic representation of lineages without morphological identification. Mitogenomes from shotgun sequencing of unsorted environmental samples and their associated metadata, placed robustly into the phylogenetic tree, constitute novel DNA "superbarcodes" for testing hypotheses regarding global patterns of diversity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBorneoColeopteraContig MappingGene FrequencyGenes, InsectGenetic VariationGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMitochondriaPhylogenyRainforestSequence Analysis, DNAbiodiversitybulk samplesColeopteracommunity ecologyIllumina MiSeqmetagenome skimmingmitochondrial genomesmitochondrial metagenomicsphylogenytree-of-life

Identifiers

PMID25957318
PMCPMC4540967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.