Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957306›Full record

ArticleJournal of leukocyte biology2015

CCR5 susceptibility to ligand-mediated down-modulation differs between human T lymphocytes and myeloid cells.

James M Fox, Richard Kasprowicz, Oliver Hartley, Nathalie Signoret

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual CCR5/CCR2 targeting: opportunities for the cure of complex disorders.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects ofOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James M Fox*Department of Biology and Hull York Medical School, Center for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom; and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Richard Kasprowicz*Department of Biology and Hull York Medical School, Center for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom; and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Oliver Hartley*Department of Biology and Hull York Medical School, Center for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom; and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathalie Signoret*Department of Biology and Hull York Medical School, Center for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom; and Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland nathalie.signoret@york.ac.uk.
Hull York Medical School · GBUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E008100/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCR5 is a chemokine receptor expressed on leukocytes and a coreceptor used by HIV-1 to enter CD4(+) T lymphocytes and macrophages. Stimulation of CCR5 by chemokines triggers internalization of chemokine-bound CCR5 molecules in a process called down-modulation, which contributes to the anti-HIV activity of chemokines. Recent studies have shown that CCR5 conformational heterogeneity influences chemokine-CCR5 interactions and HIV-1 entry in transfected cells or activated CD4(+) T lymphocytes. However, the effect of CCR5 conformations on other cell types and on the process of down-modulation remains unclear. We used mAbs, some already shown to detect distinct CCR5 conformations, to compare the behavior of CCR5 on in vitro generated human T cell blasts, monocytes and MDMs and CHO-CCR5 transfectants. All human cells express distinct antigenic forms of CCR5 not detected on CHO-CCR5 cells. The recognizable populations of CCR5 receptors exhibit different patterns of down-modulation on T lymphocytes compared with myeloid cells. On T cell blasts, CCR5 is recognized by all antibodies and undergoes rapid chemokine-mediated internalization, whereas on monocytes and MDMs, a pool of CCR5 molecules is recognized by a subset of antibodies and is not removed from the cell surface. We demonstrate that this cell surface-retained form of CCR5 responds to prolonged treatment with more-potent chemokine analogs and acts as an HIV-1 coreceptor. Our findings indicate that the regulation of CCR5 is highly specific to cell type and provide a potential explanation for the observation that native chemokines are less-effective HIV-entry inhibitors on macrophages compared with T lymphocytes.

Indexed as

Down-RegulationAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigensCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusHumansLigandsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMyeloid CellsProtein ConformationReceptors, CCR5T-LymphocytesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigensCCR5 protein, humanLigandsReceptors, CCR5chemokine receptorHIV-1Internalizationmonocytes/macrophages

Identifiers

PMID25957306
PMCPMC4560160
OpenAlexW1930656211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.