Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957302›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2015

Subcellular size.

Wallace F Marshall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The large cytoplasmic volume of oocyte.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protein transport in growing and steady-state cilia.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cell-Size Control.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  15. Biological Scaling Problems and Solutions in Amphibians.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Intracellular Scaling Mechanisms.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wallace F MarshallDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158.

Funding

Rewiring Therapeutic Cells: User-Controlled T Cells and Stem CellsP50GM081879 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIM, WENDELL A · 2010 to 2017
$19.0M
Modeling and Analysis of the Flagellar Length Control SystemR01GM097017 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MARSHALL, WALLACE · 2011 to 2018
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081879NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All of the same conceptual questions about size in organisms apply equally at the level of single cells. What determines the size, not only of the whole cell, but of all of its parts? What ensures that subcellular components are properly proportioned relative to the whole cell? How does alteration in organelle size affect biochemical function? Answering such fundamental questions requires us to understand how the size of individual organelles and other cellular structures is determined. Knowledge of organelle biogenesis and dynamics has advanced rapidly in recent years. Does this knowledge give us enough information to formulate reasonable models for organelle size control, or are we still missing something?

Indexed as

Cell SizeOrganelle BiogenesisOrganellesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID25957302
PMCPMC4448603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.