Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957278›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2016

Age-related differences in the P3 amplitude in change blindness.

Katharina Bergmann, Anna-Lena Schubert, Dirk Hagemann, Andrea Schankin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharina BergmannInstitute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany. katharina.bergmann@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de.
Anna-Lena SchubertInstitute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dirk HagemannInstitute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea SchankinInstitute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Hauptstrasse 47-51, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observers often miss visual changes in the environment when they co-occur with other visual disruptions. This phenomenon is called change blindness. Previous research has shown that change blindness increases with age. The aim of the current study was to explore the role of post-perceptual stimulus processing in age differences. Therefore, the P3 component of the event-related potential was measured while younger, middle-aged, and older participants performed a change detection task under different task demands. Older adults detected fewer changes than younger adults, even when the task was very easy. Detected changes elicited greater P3 amplitudes than undetected changes in younger adults. This effect was reduced or even absent for middle-aged and older participants, irrespective of task demands. Because this P3 effect is supposed to reflect participants' confidence in change detection, less confidence in own responses may explain the decline of change detection performance in normal aging.

Indexed as

BlindnessTask Performance and AnalysisAdultAgedAgingElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.