ArticleThe protein journal2015
Studies on the molecular docking and amino Acid residues involving in recognition of substrate in proline iminopeptidase by site-directed mutagenesis.
Article in The protein journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Proteomics Reveals the Difference in Root Cold Resistance betweenPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proline iminopeptidase (PchPiPA) of Phanerochaete chrysosporium catalyze specifically hydrolysis of N-terminal proline from peptides. The substrate Pro-pNA was docked into the catalytic pocket and several amino acid residues were identified to interact or associate with the substrate. Eight residues were selected for site-directed mutagenesis. The wild-type and mutant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. Kinetic parameters were calculated by hydrolyzing Pro-pNA for these enzymes. Substitution of two Glu residues (Glu198 and Glu227) which interact with the substrate via formation of hydrogen bond, led to deleterious effect on catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) due to decrease of k(cat) and increase of K(m). Four Phe residues consisting of catalytic pocket and surrounding the docked substrate, were substituted with Ala, resulting in decrease in k(cat)/K(m) to various extents. Substitution of two residues (Val267 and Cys267) localized at the deep end of the catalytic pocket also yielded negative influence on the substrate hydrolysis. Besides, all the mutants except E227Q exhibited lower thermostability than the wild-type did, indicating that these mutations may modulate the local structure. In conclusion, these amino acid residues may play an important role in maintaining local environment of the impacted catalytic pocket and be involved in recognizing or positioning the substrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.