Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25957011›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Feasibility of a quality improvement strategy integrating psychosocial care into 28 medical cancer centers (HuCare project).

Rodolfo Passalacqua, Maria Antonietta Annunziata, Claudia Borreani, Francesca Diodati, Luciano Isa, Jessica Saleri, Claudio Verusio, Caterina Caminiti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The new challenge for improving psychosocial cancer care: shifting to a system-based approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  6. Feasibility of implementing the 'Screening for Distress and Referral Need' process in 23 Dutch hospitals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodolfo PassalacquaDivision of Medical Oncology, Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Viale Concordia, 1, Cremona, 26100, Italy. r.passalacqua@ospedale.cremona.it.
Maria Antonietta AnnunziataUnit of Oncological Psychology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy.
Claudia BorreaniUnit of Clinical Psychology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Francesca DiodatiResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Luciano IsaDivision of Oncology, Hospital of Melegnano, Milan, Italy.
Jessica SaleriDivision of Medical Oncology, Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Viale Concordia, 1, Cremona, 26100, Italy.
Claudio VerusioDivision of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Saronno, Saronno, Varese, Italy.
Caterina CaminitiResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examines the development and feasibility of a quality improvement strategy for the translation of evidence-based psychosocial care into clinical practice.

methodsThe project involved all staff (oncologists, psychologists, and nurses) of the participating centers. Recommendations concerned: improvement of clinician communication skills; use of a patient question prompt list; assignment of a specialist nurse to each patient; screening for psychological distress and social needs; opportunity to attend a Point of Information and Support. The implementation strategy hinged on context analysis and problem solving. Four to six visits were held in each center by the project team to assist staff in identifying obstacles, finding solutions, and strengthening motivation. The primary variable was the adherence percentage to the recommendations (proportion of subjects receiving each intervention). The number of centers that failed to reach the objective was also reported (adherence percentage <75%).

resultsTwenty-seven of twenty-eight centers completed the study. Lack of resources was the most commonly perceived barrier preimplementation. Five-hundred-forty-five clinicians were actively involved in the project and completed training. The adherence percentage for each recommendation was greater than 85% except for the question prompt list (78%; 95% CI, 73-83%), where seven centers did not reach the objective.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that evidence-based interventions to improve the psychosocial care of people with cancer can be implemented in a diverse range of oncology wards. This requires the involvement and motivation of the entire staff of the ward, support by an expert team, and promotion by policymakers.

Indexed as

AdultCommunicationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychotherapyQuality ImprovementCommunication skillsOncologyPsychosocial careQuestion prompt listSocial needsSpecialist nurse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.