Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956938›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Visual assessment of early emphysema and interstitial abnormalities on CT is useful in lung cancer risk analysis.

Mathilde M W Wille, Laura H Thomsen, Jens Petersen, Marleen de Bruijne, Asger Dirksen, Jesper H Pedersen, Saher B Shaker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathilde M W WilleDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, opg. 1D, st.th, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark. mathilde.winkler@gmail.com.
Laura H ThomsenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jens PetersenDepartment of Computer Science, DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Marleen de BruijneDepartment of Computer Science, DIKU, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Asger DirksenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, opg. 1D, st.th, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Jesper H PedersenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Saher B ShakerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, opg. 1D, st.th, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKErasmus MC · NLHvidovre Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesScreening for lung cancer should be limited to a high-risk-population, and abnormalities in low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening images may be relevant for predicting the risk of lung cancer. Our aims were to compare the occurrence of visually detected emphysema and interstitial abnormalities in subjects with and without lung cancer in a screening population of smokers.

methodsLow-dose chest CT examinations (baseline and latest possible) of 1990 participants from The Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial were independently evaluated by two observers who scored emphysema and interstitial abnormalities. Emphysema (lung density) was also measured quantitatively.

resultsEmphysema was seen more frequently and its extent was greater among participants with lung cancer on baseline (odds ratio (OR), 1.8, p = 0.017 and p = 0.002) and late examinations (OR 2.6, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). No significant difference was found using quantitative measurements. Interstitial abnormalities were more common findings among participants with lung cancer (OR 5.1, p < 0.001 and OR 4.5, p < 0.001).There was no association between presence of emphysema and presence of interstitial abnormalities (OR 0.75, p = 0.499).

conclusionsEven early signs of emphysema and interstitial abnormalities are associated with lung cancer. Quantitative measurements of emphysema-regardless of type-do not show the same association. KEY POINTS: • Visually detected emphysema on CT is more frequent in individuals who develop lung cancer. • Emphysema grading is higher in those who develop lung cancer. • Interstitial abnormalities, including discrete changes, are associated with lung cancer. • Quantitative lung density measurements are not useful in lung cancer risk prediction. • Early CT signs of emphysema and interstitial abnormalities can predict future risk.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsObserver VariationOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary EmphysemaReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedComorbidityComputed tomographyEmphysemaInterstitial abnormalitiesLung cancer

Identifiers

PMID25956938
OpenAlexW774466653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.