Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956910›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2015

Academic detailing of general practitioners by a respiratory physician for diagnosis and management of refractory breathlessness: a randomised pilot study.

Aileen Collier, Debra Rowett, Peter Allcroft, Aine Greene, David C Currow

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aileen CollierDiscipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia. aileen.collier@flinders.edu.au.
Debra RowettDrug and Therapeutics Information Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia. debra.rowett@health.sa.gov.au.
Peter AllcroftSouthern Adelaide Palliative Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia. allc@adam.com.au.
Aine GreeneSouthern Adelaide Palliative Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, South Australia. aine.greene@health.sa.gov.au.
David C CurrowDiscipline, Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia. david.currow@flinders.edu.au.
Repatriation General Hospital · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcademic detailing (AD; also known as educational visiting) facilitates the translation of evidence into practice and has been widely adopted internationally to facilitate practice change. The potential of AD linked to a specific patient and delivered by a specialist physician to general practitioners has not been evaluated. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of AD on the knowledge and confidence of GPs caring for people with advanced cancer who had breathlessness at the end of life.

methodsIn this randomised controlled pilot, 35 patient/GP dyads were randomised to AD or usual care. Key messages included: ensuring reversible causes were optimally treated; non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments were considered; and oxygen considered for hypoxaemic patients.

resultsAcceptability: The majority of GPs randomised to AD agreed to participate, reporting benefits to practice. The majority of GPs in the control group requested a copy of academic detailing written materials at study completion. Feasibility: AD visits to GPs' offices could be timetabled reasonably easily, with 24 detailing visits occurring. Self-reported knowledge and beliefs: Ninety two percent of GPs reported the topics covered in the AD sessions were useful, with 83% reporting an increase in knowledge and confidence. AD sessions resulted in 58% of GPs reporting a change in their approach to the management of breathlessness. By contrast, 81% of the usual care group reported low confidence in the management and knowledge of breathlessness.

conclusionAD was acceptable and feasible to participating GPs. This pilot supports proceeding to a fully powered study.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTranslational Research, BiomedicalAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ManagementDyspneaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSpecializationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25956910
PMCPMC4428237
OpenAlexW1514355680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.