Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956829›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2016

Neonatal sensory nerve injury-induced synaptic plasticity in the trigeminal principal sensory nucleus.

Fu-Sun Lo, Reha S Erzurumlu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fu-Sun LoDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: fusunlo@gmail.com.
Reha S ErzurumluDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Funding

SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND PLASTICITYR01NS039050 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ERZURUMLU, REHA S · 2000 to 2013
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS039050NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory deprivation studies in neonatal mammals, such as monocular eye closure, whisker trimming, and chemical blockade of the olfactory epithelium have revealed the importance of sensory inputs in brain wiring during distinct critical periods. But very few studies have paid attention to the effects of neonatal peripheral sensory nerve damage on synaptic wiring of the central nervous system (CNS) circuits. Peripheral somatosensory nerves differ from other special sensory afferents in that they are more prone to crush or severance because of their locations in the body. Unlike the visual and auditory afferents, these nerves show regenerative capabilities after damage. Uniquely, damage to a somatosensory peripheral nerve does not only block activity incoming from the sensory receptors but also mediates injury-induced neuro- and glial chemical signals to the brain through the uninjured central axons of the primary sensory neurons. These chemical signals can have both far more and longer lasting effects than sensory blockade alone. Here we review studies which focus on the consequences of neonatal peripheral sensory nerve damage in the principal sensory nucleus of the brainstem trigeminal complex.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticitySensory Receptor CellsSynapsesAnimalsAnimals, NewbornHumansInfant, NewbornPeripheral Nerve InjuriesTrigeminal NucleiAstrocytesInfraorbital nerveReactive synaptogenesisSilent synapsesWhisker–barrel system

Identifiers

PMID25956829
PMCPMC4636484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.