Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956479›Full record

Observational studyJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2015

Electrolyte and hemodynamic changes following percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation with the LARIAT device.

Ryan Maybrook, Jayasree Pillarisetti, Vivek Yarlagadda, Sampath Gunda, Arun Raghav Mahankali Sridhar, Brent Deibert, Muhammad R Afzal, Madhu Reddy, Donita Atkins, Matthew Earnest and 8 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Left Atrial Appendage Closure on Neuroendocrine Function in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surgical clip closure of the left atrial appendage.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Left atrial appendage-beyond being a thrombus-spreading tiger.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018
    Article
  10. Cardiovascular Therapies Targeting Left Atrial Appendage.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  11. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: What Are the Options and Where is the Evidence?The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2018
    Review
  12. Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2017
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ryan MaybrookDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Mid America Cardiology, University of Kansas Hospital & Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jayasree Pillarisetti
Vivek Yarlagadda
Sampath Gunda
Arun Raghav Mahankali Sridhar
Brent Deibert
Muhammad R Afzal
Madhu Reddy
Donita Atkins
Matthew Earnest
Ryan Ferrell
Jayant Nath
Arun Kanmanthareddy
Sudharani Bommana
Rajasingh Johnson
Sandeep Reddy Koripalli
Buddhadeb Dawn
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe left atrial appendage (LAA) is a well-known source of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and therefore plays an important role in homeostasis. The neurohormonal impact of epicardial exclusion of the LAA with the LARIAT procedure is unknown. In this proof-of-concept study, we postulated that LAA exclusion would impact homeostasis as evidenced by changes in electrolytes and blood pressure (BP).

methodsA total of 76 patients who underwent successful LAA exclusion were enrolled in this retrospective observational study utilizing a prospective registry. Electrolytes, BP, and heart rate (HR) were monitored before LARIAT and post-LARIAT (24 and 72 h and 6 months).

resultsThere was a significant reduction of systolic BP (mmHg) at 24 h (113.3 ± 16.0; p < 0.0001) and 72 h (119.0 ± 18.4 mmHg; p < 0.0001) post-LARIAT when compared with pre-LARIAT BP (138.2 ± 21.3). The reduction in systolic BP persisted at 6-month follow-up (128.8 ± 17.3; p = 0.0005). There was significant reduction in serum sodium (mmol/L) at 24 h (135.4 ± 3.6; p < 0.0001) and 72 h (136.3 ± 3.7; p < 0.001) post-LARIAT when compared to pre-LARIAT (138.7 ± 3.2). The reduction in sodium was not persistent at 6-month follow-up (138.4 ± 3.3; p = 0.453).

conclusionsLAA exclusion results in an early and persistent decrease in systolic BP. Additionally, there is an early decline in serum sodium, which normalizes at long-term follow-up. The underlying mechanism leading to these changes is not entirely clear; however, it is likely related to neurohormonal changes post LAA exclusion.

Indexed as

Atrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationBlood PressureEquipment DesignFemaleHumansHypertensionLigationMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeWater-Electrolyte BalanceWater-Electrolyte Imbalance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.