Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956385›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?) - a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

David Beard, Jonathan Rees, Ines Rombach, Cushla Cooper, Jonathan Cook, Naomi Merritt, Alastair Gray, Stephen Gwilym, Andrew Judge, Julian Savulescu and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01623011 (What is the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Sub-acromial Decompression Surgery?), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01623011 nacompletednot on this map

What is the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Sub-acromial Decompression Surgery?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2012 to 2016Enrolled313ConditionsShoulder Impingement SyndromeArmsArthroscopic Sub-acromial Decompression Surgery, Shoulder Arthroscopy, Active Monitoring with Specialist Reassessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David BeardNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. david.beard@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Jonathan ReesNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. jonathan.rees@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Ines RombachNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. ines.rombach@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Cushla CooperNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. cushla.cooper@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Jonathan CookNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. jonathan.cook@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Naomi MerrittNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. naomi.merritt@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Alastair GrayNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. alastair.gray@dph.ox.ac.uk.
Stephen GwilymNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. steve.gwilym@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Andrew JudgeNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. andrew.judge@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Julian SavulescuInstitute for Science and Ethics, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, 16/17 St Ebbe's Street, Oxford, OX1 1PT, UK. julian.savulescu@philosophy.ox.ac.uk.
Jane MoserNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. jane.moser@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Jenny DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. jenny.donovan@bristol.ac.uk.
Marcus JepsonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. marcus.jepson@bristol.ac.uk.
Caroline WilsonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. marcus.jepson@bristol.ac.uk.
Irene TraceyNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. irene@fmrib.ox.ac.uk.
Karolina WartolowskaNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. karolina.wartolowska@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Benjamin DeanNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. benjamin.dean@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
Andrew CarrNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. andrew.carr@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
CSAW Study Group
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700399Versus Arthritis 19707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) is a commonly performed surgical intervention for shoulder pain. The rationale is that removal of a bony acromial spur relieves symptoms by decompressing rotator cuff tendons passing through the subacromial space. However, the efficacy of this procedure is uncertain. The objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ASAD in patients with subacromial pain using appropriate control groups, including placebo intervention. METHODS/

designThe trial is a three-group, parallel design, pragmatic, randomised controlled study. The intervention content for each group (ASAD, active monitoring with specialist reassessment (AMSR) and investigational shoulder arthroscopy only (AO)) enables assessment of (1) the efficacy of the surgery against no surgery; (2) the need for a specific component of the surgery-namely, removal of the bony spur; and (3) quantification of the placebo effect. Concealed allocation was performed using a 1:1:1 randomisation ratio and using age, sex, baseline Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and centre as minimisation criteria. The primary outcome measure is the OSS at 6 months post randomisation. A total of 300 patients recruited over 24 months from a minimum of 14 UK shoulder units over 24 months were required to detect a difference of 4.5 points on the OSS (standard deviation, 9) with 90% power and to allow for 15% loss to follow-up. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness, pain, complications and patient satisfaction. A substantial qualitative research component is included. The primary analysis will be conducted on the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be used to assess the robustness of the results with regard to the underlying assumptions about missing data using multiple imputation. DISCUSSION: This trial uses an innovative design to account for the known placebo effects of surgery, but it also will delineate the mechanism for any benefit from surgery. The investigational AO group is considered a placebo intervention (not sham surgery), as it includes all components of subacromial decompression except the critical surgical element. Some discussion is also dedicated to the challenges of conducting placebo surgery trials. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: UK Clinical Research Network UKCRN12104. Registered 22 May 2012. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN33864128 . Registered 22 June 2012. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01623011 . Registered 15 June 2012.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAcromionArthroscopyClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleOsteophytePain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID25956385
PMCPMC4443660
OpenAlexW1772962071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.