Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25956368›Full record

Trial reportFertility and sterility2015

Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Barbara Luke, Judy E Stern, Milton Kotelchuck, Eugene R Declercq, Mark D Hornstein, Daksha Gopal, Lan Hoang, Hafsatou Diop

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Fertility and sterility, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Number of embryos transferred and diagnosis of preeclampsia.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara LukeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Electronic address: lukeb@msu.edu.
Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Milton KotelchuckMassGeneral Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eugene R DeclercqDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark D HornsteinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daksha GopalDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lan HoangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hafsatou DiopMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Women's Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD067270 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DIOP, HAFSATOU, STERN, JUDY E · 2011 to 2020
$7.4M
Child Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD064595 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI DECLERCQ, EUGENE R, DIOP, HAFSATOU · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064595NICHD NIH HHS R01HD064595NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes by number of embryos transferred (ET) and fetal heartbeats (FHB) in assisted reproductive technology-conceived singleton live births.

designLongitudinal cohort using cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System between 2004 and 2008 among women who were treated and gave birth in Massachusetts.

settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Assisted reproductive technology data on 6,073 births between 2004 and 2008 were linked to vital records and hospital data. Likelihood of ET ≥3 vs. 1-2, FHB >1 vs. 1, and risks of preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks' gestation), low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g), and small-for-gestational-age birth weight (SGA, <10th percentile) with FHB >1 were modeled with binary logistic regression using a backward-stepping algorithm, and presented as adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): ET ≥3, FHB >1, PTB, LBW, and SGA. RESULT(S): Higher ET was significantly more likely with older maternal age, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, assisted hatching, cleavage-stage embryos, and thawed embryos. The likelihood of FHB >1 with ≥3 ET vs. 1-2 ET was 2.04 (1.68-2.48). Risks of PTB and LBW with FHB >1 were 1.63 (1.27-2.09) and 1.81 (1.36-2.39), respectively; the risk of SGA was not significant. Nulliparity was associated with higher risks of PTB (1.34 [1.12-1.59]), LBW (1.48 [1.20-1.83]), and SGA (2.17 [1.69-2.78]). CONCLUSION(S): Number of embryos transferred was strongly associated with FHBs, with twice the risk of FHB >1 with ≥3 ET vs. 1-2 ET. Increasing FHBs were associated with significantly greater risks for PTB and LBW outcomes.

Indexed as

FertilizationParityAdultCohort StudiesEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesAssisted reproductive technologybirth outcomesembryos transferredfetal heartbeats

Identifiers

PMID25956368
PMCPMC4489987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.